The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 84:369-371 (2002)
© 2002 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Analysis of Polyethylene Thickness of Tibial Components in Total Knee Replacement
S. A. Edwards, FRCS,
H. G. Pandit, FRCS(Orth),
J. L. Ramos, MD, PhD, FRCS(Orth) and
M. L. Grover, FRCS
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Queen
Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, England
S.A. Edwards, FRCS
29 Valerian Avenue, Titchfield, Fareham, Hants P015 5TF, United
Kingdom. E-mail address: stuart{at}eedwards.freeserve.co.uk
H.G. Pandit, FRCS(Orth)
J.L. Ramos, MD, PhD, FRCS(Orth)
M.L. Grover, FRCS
Department of Orthopaedics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham,
Portsmouth PO6 3LY, England
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from
a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject
of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
Background: Excessive wear of the polyethylene
bearing surfaces of tibial components has become an important factor
in early failure of total knee arthroplasty. Inadequate thickness
of the polyethylene insert is one cause of excessive wear, and various
minimum thicknesses have been recommended in order to reduce contact
stresses within the polyethylene. However, the true thicknesses
of modular polyethylene tibial inserts typically are not stated
accurately by the manufacturers in their product information. The
purpose of this study was to determine whether the information about
the thickness of tibial inserts supplied by the manufacturers is
adequate.
Methods: Five of the thinnest available polyethylene
tibial inserts from five different manufacturers were selected.
The minimum thickness of each was measured with use of a Sigma electronic
micrometer comparator to an accuracy of ±0.005 mm.
Results: The stated thicknesses of the polyethylene tibial inserts
were 8, 9, and 10 mm, values that differed markedly from the actual
minimum thicknesses, which ranged from 5.5722 to 6.2048 mm (mean
values).
Conclusion: The thickness of polyethylene tibial
inserts has been implicated as a potential cause of excessive wear
and early failure of total knee replacements. This paper highlights
the fact that the information supplied by the manufacturers is inaccurate and
potentially misleading; in one case, the true thickness was much
less than the recommended minimum thickness. We recommend that the
minimum thickness of the tibial components as well as the combined
thickness of the polyethylene insert and the metal tibial tray be
specified in the product information and on the packaged insert.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Sofka, R. S. Adler, and R. Laskin
Sonography of Polyethylene Liners Used in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
May 1, 2003;
180(5):
1437 - 1441.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|