The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 84:359-368 (2002)
© 2002 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Analysis of Vertebral Morphology in Idiopathic Scoliosis with Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multiplanar Reconstruction
Ulf R. Liljenqvist, MD,
Thomas Allkemper, MD,
Lars Hackenberg, MD,
Thomas M. Link, MD,
Jörn Steinbeck, MD and
Henry F.H. Halm, MD
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Universitätsklinikum
Münster, Germany
Ulf R. Liljenqvist, MD
Thomas Allkemper, MD
Lars Hackenberg, MD
Jörn Steinbeck, MD
Departments of Orthopaedics (U.R.L., L.H., and J.S.) and Clinical
Radiology (T.A.), Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse
33, 48149 Münster, Germany. E-mail address for U.R. Liljen-
qvist: liljenqv{at}uni-muenster.de
Thomas M. Link, MD
Department of Radiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger
Strasse 22, 81675 München, Germany
Henry F.H. Halm, MD
Department of Spinal Surgery, Klinikum Neustadt, Am Kiebitzberg
10, 23730 Neustadt, Germany
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support
of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not
receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement
to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial
entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits
to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other
charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are
affiliated or associated.
Background: Several studies have provided data
on the vertebral morphology of normal spines, but there is a paucity
of data on the vertebral morphology in patients with idiopathic
scoliosis.
Methods: The morphology of the pedicles and bodies
of 307 vertebrae as well as the distance between the pedicles and
the dural sac (the epidural space) in twenty-six patients with right-sided thoracic
idiopathic scoliosis were analyzed with use of magnetic resonance
imaging and multiplanar reconstruction.
Results: A distinct vertebral asymmetry was found
at the apical region of the thoracic curves, with significantly
thinner pedicles on the concave side than on the convex side (p < 0.05).
The degree of intravertebral deformity diminished farther away from
the apex, with vertebral symmetry restored at the neutral level.
In the thoracic spine, the transverse endosteal width of the apical
pedicles measured between 2.3 mm and 3.2 mm on the concave side
and between 3.9 mm and 4.4 mm on the convex side (p < 0.05).
In the lumbar spine, the pedicle width measured between 4.6 mm at
the cephalad part of the curve and 7.9 mm at the caudad part of
the curve. The chord length and the pedicle length gradually increased
from 34 mm and 18 mm, respectively, at the fourth thoracic vertebra
to 51 mm and 25 mm, respectively, at the third lumbar vertebra.
The transverse pedicle angle measured 15° in the cephalad aspect of
the thoracic spine, decreased to 7° at the twelfth thoracic vertebra,
and increased again to 16° at the fourth lumbar vertebra. The width
of the epidural space was <1 mm at the thoracic apical
vertebral levels and averaged 1 mm at the lumbar apical vertebral
levels on the concave side, whereas it was between 3 mm and 5 mm
on the convex side (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Idiopathic scoliosis is associated with
distinctive intravertebral deformity, with smaller pedicles on the
concave side and a shift of the dural sac toward the concavity.
Clinical Relevance: Care must be exercised during
pedicle-screw instrumentation, especially in the apical region of
the concavity of thoracic curves, because of the small pedicle width
and the limited epidural safe zone in this area. Surgeons should
be aware of these altered conditions when considering pedicle-screw
instrumentation for patients with thoracic scoliosis.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Sucato and C. Duchene
The Position of the Aorta Relative to the Spine: A Comparison of Patients with and without Idiopathic Scoliosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2003;
85(8):
1461 - 1469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Sarwark
What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedics
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2003;
85(5):
976 - 981.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|