This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walch, G.
Right arrow Articles by Adeleine, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walch, G.
Right arrow Articles by Adeleine, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 84:2186-2191 (2002)
© 2002 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Scientific Article

The Influence of Glenohumeral Prosthetic Mismatch on Glenoid Radiolucent Lines

Results of a Multicenter Study

Gilles Walch, MD, T. Bradley Edwards, MD, Aziz Boulahia, MD, Pascal Boileau, MD, Daniel Mole, MD and Patrice Adeleine, PhD

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique Sainte Anne Lumière, Lyon, France

Gilles Walch, MD
Aziz Boulahia, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique Sainte Anne Lumière, 85 Cours Albert Thomas, 69003 Lyon, France. E-mail address for G. Walch: walch.gilles{at}wanadoo.fr

T. Bradley Edwards, MD
Minneapolis Sports Medicine Center, 7201 Washington Avenue South, Edina, MN 55439
Pascal Boileau, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital de l'Archet, 151 Route de Saint Antoine de Ginestière BP 79, 06202 Nice CEDEX, France

Daniel Molé, MD
Clinique Traumatologique et Orthopédique, 49 Rue Hermine, SC 5211, F-54052 Nancy CEDEX, France

Patrice Adeleine, PhD
Department of Biostatistics, Hôpitaux de Lyon, 162 Avenue Lacassagne, 69424 Lyon CEDEX 03, France

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Association pour le Développement de la Pathologie de l'Epaule. In addition, one or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commer- cial entity (Tornier Company). Also, a commercial entity (Tornier Company) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: In shoulder arthroplasty, mismatch is defined as the difference in the radius or diameter of curvature between the humeral head and glenoid components. Recommendations for mismatch have not been substantiated scientifically. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mismatch on glenoid radiolucent lines.

Methods: The results of 319 total shoulder arthroplasties performed for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis were evaluated. All of the arthroplasties were performed with a single type of prosthesis (Aequalis; Tornier, Montbonnot, France) that included a cemented, all-polyethylene glenoid component. Three sizes of glenoid components and seven humeral head diameters were utilized. Radial mismatch was categorized as ≤4 mm, 4.5 to 5.5 mm, 6 to 7 mm, or >7 to 10 mm. Radiographs were evaluated at a mean of 53.5 months (range, twenty-four to 110 months) postoperatively. Glenoid radiolucent lines were scored with a scale ranging from 0 points for no radiolucency to 18 points for radiolucent lines exceeding 2 mm in six zones. Variance, linear contrasts polynomial, quadratic polynomial contrast statistical, and linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between radial mismatch and glenoid radiolucent lines.

Results: A significant linear relationship was found between mismatch and the glenoid radiolucency score (p < 0.0001), with significantly lower (better) radiolucency scores associated with radial mismatches of >5.5 mm.

Conclusions: In this study of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch ranging from 0 to 10 mm, the mismatch had a significant influence on the scores for the glenoid radiolucent lines, which were best when the radial mismatch was between 6 and 10 mm. The theoretical risk of prosthetic instability with larger mismatch values was not demonstrated within the range of mismatch values evaluated in this series.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
F. A. Matsen III, J. Clinton, J. Lynch, A. Bertelsen, and M. L. Richardson
Glenoid Component Failure in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2008; 90(4): 885 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. I. Bohsali, M. A. Wirth, and C. A. Rockwood Jr.
Complications of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2006; 88(10): 2279 - 2292.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. Boileau, R. J. Sinnerton, C. Chuinard, and G. Walch
Arthroplasty of the shoulder
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 562 - 575.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. H. Yian, C. M.L. Werner, R. W. Nyffeler, C. W. Pfirrmann, A. Ramappa, A. Sukthankar, and C. Gerber
Radiographic and Computed Tomography Analysis of Cemented Pegged Polyethylene Glenoid Components in Total Shoulder Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2005; 87(9): 1928 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. Mileti, J. W. Sperling, R. H. Cofield, J. R. Harrington, and T. L. Hoskin
Monoblock and modular total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 496 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]