This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schneeberger, A. G. Articles by Gerber, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schneeberger, A. G. Articles by Gerber, C. Social Bookmarking             What's this?

Mechanical Strength of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques

An in Vitro Study

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Zurich, Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland

Alberto G. Schneeberger, MD
Andreas von Roll, MD
Fabian Kalberer, MD
Hilaire A.C. Jacob, PhD
Christian Gerber, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Zurich, Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail address for A.G. Schneeberger: schneeberger.a{at}balgrist.ch

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Retears after rotator cuff repairs occur relatively frequently and may compromise the functional result. The goal of this study was to analyze the mechanical properties following arthroscopic techniques for rotator cuff repair and to evaluate possible alternative techniques.

Methods: In the first part, five different bone anchors (the Revo screw; Mitek Rotator Cuff anchor, 5.0-mm Statak, PANALOK RC absorbable anchor, and 5.0-mm Bio-Statak) were tested in vitro under cyclic loading on five pairs of cadaveric shoulders. Then five types of arthroscopic tendon suturing instruments were tested on rotator cuff tendons. Finally, the arthroscopically performed mattress and modified Mason-Allen stitches, fixed with either the Revo screw or the Bio-Statak, were evaluated on ten pairs of human cadaveric shoulders.

Results: The holding strengths of the various anchors were similar, ranging from 130 to 180 N, and approximated the holding strength of knotted number-2 suture materials. The fixation of the tested anchors yielded comparable values of stiffness except for one anchor, which showed significantly greater subsidence under cyclic load (p = 0.003). All tested, commercially available arthroscopic suturing devices were unsuitable for performing a modified Mason-Allen stitch on normal supraspinatus tendons. Modification of a commercially available suture punch with a longer needle allowed us to consistently perform a modified Mason-Allen stitch. The modified Mason-Allen stitch, which has shown favorable mechanical properties in open repairs of the rotator cuff, was not found to be stronger than the mattress stitch when performed arthroscopically and used with bone anchors. When the modified Mason-Allen stitch was fixed to one anchor, it was even weaker than a mattress stitch repaired with another anchor (168 versus 228 N). Unequal loading of the two suture branches due to the more rigid modified Mason-Allen stitch may be the reason for this difference.

Conclusions: Arthroscopic techniques for rotator cuff repair with use of the mattress stitch and bone anchors allow for a relatively solid fixation. The holding strength is not improved with use of the modified Mason-Allen stitch. Although a direct comparison with previous in vitro studies is not possible, the holding strength of open fixation techniques seems to be stronger. If rotator cuffs are subjected to high postoperative loading, open repair might be preferred to reduce the risk of a retear, until stronger arthroscopic fixation techniques are developed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Lorbach, F. Bachelier, J. Vees, D. Kohn, and D. Pape Cyclic Loading of Rotator Cuff Reconstructions: Single-Row Repair With Modified Suture Configurations Versus Double-Row Repair Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1504 - 1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. S. Ahmad, C. Kleweno, A. M. Jacir, J. E. Bell, T. R. Gardner, W. N. Levine, and L. U. Bigliani Biomechanical Performance of Rotator Cuff Repairs With Humeral Rotation: A New Rotator Cuff Repair Failure Model Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 888 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Mazzocca, L. M. Rincon, R. W. O'Connor, E. Obopilwe, M. Andersen, L. Geaney, and R. A. Arciero Intra-articular Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Analysis of Injured and Repaired Strain Behavior Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 110 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Bushnell, I. R. Byram, P. S. Weinhold, and R. A. Creighton The Use of Suture Anchors in Repair of the Ruptured Patellar Tendon: A Biomechanical Study Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2006; 34(9): 1492 - 1499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Kim, N. S. ElAttrache, J. E. Tibone, B.-J. Jun, S. N. DeLaMora, R. S. Kvitne, and T. Q. Lee Biomechanical Comparison of a Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Anchor Technique for Rotator Cuff Repair Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2006; 34(3): 407 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. Ma, L. Comerford, J. Wilson, and C. M. Puttlitz Biomechanical Evaluation of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs: Double-Row Compared with Single-Row Fixation J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 403 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. B. Park, E. Keyurapan, H. S. Gill, H. S. Selhi, and E. G. McFarland Suture Anchors and Tacks for Shoulder Surgery, Part II: The Prevention and Treatment of Complications Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2006; 34(1): 136 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. G. McFarland, H. B. Park, E. Keyurapan, H. S. Gill, and H. S. Selhi Suture Anchors and Tacks for Shoulder Surgery, Part 1: Biology and Biomechanics Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2005; 33(12): 1918 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Ponce, R. S. Ahluwalia, A. D. Mazzocca, R. G. Gobezie, J. J.P. Warner, and P. J. Millett Biomechanical and Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Lesser Tuberosity Repair Technique in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(suppl_2): 1 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Mazzocca, P. J. Millett, C. A. Guanche, S. A. Santangelo, and R. A. Arciero Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2005; 33(12): 1861 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. D. Boehm, A. Werner, S. Radtke, T. Mueller, S. Kirschner, and F. Gohlke The effect of suture materials and techniques on the outcome of repair of the rotator cuff: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED STUDY J Bone Joint Surg Br, June 1, 2005; 87-B(6): 819 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Boileau, N. Brassart, D. J. Watkinson, M. Carles, A. M. Hatzidakis, and S. G. Krishnan Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Tears of the Supraspinatus: Does the Tendon Really Heal? J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2005; 87(6): 1229 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. De Carli, A. Vadala, E. Monaco, L. Labianca, E. Zanzotto, and A. Ferretti Effect of Cyclic Loading on New Polyblend Suture Coupled With Different Anchors Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2005; 33(2): 214 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Klepps, J. Bishop, J. Lin, O. Cahlon, A. Strauss, P. Hayes, and E. L. Flatow Prospective Evaluation of the Effect of Rotator Cuff Integrity on the Outcome of Open Rotator Cuff Repairs Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 32(7): 1716 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Tingart, M. Apreleva, J. Lehtinen, D. Zurakowski, and J. J. P. Warner Anchor Design and Bone Mineral Density Affect the Pull-out Strength of Suture Anchors in Rotator Cuff Repair: Which Anchors Are Best to Use in Patients With Low Bone Quality? Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2004; 32(6): 1466 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. Ma, J. D. MacGillivray, J. Clabeaux, S. Lee, and J. C. Otis Biomechanical Evaluation of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Stitches J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2004; 86(6): 1211 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Miller What's New in Sports Medicine J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2004; 86(3): 653 - 661. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Tingart, M. Apreleva, D. Zurakowski, and J. J.P. Warner Pullout Strength of Suture Anchors Used in Rotator Cuff Repair J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2003; 85(11): 2190 - 2198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2002 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.