This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Letters to the Editor: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Long, J. Articles by Riew, K. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Long, J. Articles by Riew, K. D. Social Bookmarking             What's this?

The Effect of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors on Spinal Fusion

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital at Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

John Long, DVM
Stephen Lewis, MD
Timothy Kuklo, MD
Yong Zhu, MD
K. Daniel Riew, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital at Washington University, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, West Pavilion, Suite 11300, St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail address for K.D. Riew: riewd{at}msnotes.wustl.edu

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Spine surgeons discourage the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs following spine arthrodesis because of their inhibitory effect on bone-healing. To our knowledge, there are no data on the effects of the new cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on bone-healing. We undertook this study to determine the effects of these more selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on spinal fusion in a rabbit model.

Methods: Seventy-two New Zealand White rabbits underwent a posterolateral intertransverse process arthrodesis with use of autologous iliac crest bone. Sixty-six rabbits survived the surgical procedure and the perioperative period and had an uneventful postoperative course. These rabbits were randomly divided into three groups. One group received 10 mg/kg of celecoxib orally, the second group received 10 mg/kg of indomethacin orally, and the third group (the control group) received 1 cm ³ of saline solution orally. The rabbits received the treatment daily for eight weeks, after which they were killed and the lumbar spine was harvested. The specimens were palpated for motion, radiographed, and prepared for histological analysis. The quality of the fusion was graded at each level by assigning a histological score of 0 to 7.

Results: Gross inspection and palpation revealed that 64% (fourteen) of the twenty-two control spines and 45% (ten) of the twenty-two spines in the rabbits treated with celecoxib were fused. With the numbers available, this difference was not significant (p = 0.224). Of the twenty-two spines in the indomethacin-treated rabbits, 18% (four) were fused, and this percentage was significantly different from the control value (p = 0.002). On radiographic assessment, the spine segment was deemed to be fused in 82% (eighteen) of the twenty-two controls, 86% (nineteen) of the twenty-two rabbits treated with celecoxib, and 41% (nine) of the twenty-two indomethacin-treated animals. Only the difference between the indomethacin-treated and control groups was significant (p = 0.004). The histological scores averaged 5.2, 4.8, and 3.5 for the control, celecoxib, and indomethacin groups, respectively. There was a significant difference between the control and indomethacin groups (p = 0.002) but not between the celecoxib and control groups (p = 0.161).

Conclusions: These results suggest that celecoxib does not significantly inhibit the rate of spinal fusion in rabbits. They also suggest that the inhibitory effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on bone-healing are likely mediated by inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 and that celecoxib is the better choice if treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is deemed necessary following spinal arthrodesis.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. B. Goodman, W. Jiranek, E. Petrow, and A. W. Yasko The Effects of Medications on Bone J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2007; 15(8): 450 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Murnaghan, G. Li, and D. R. Marsh Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Induced Fracture Nonunion: An Inhibition of Angiogenesis? J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2006; 88(suppl_3): 140 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Cohen, S. Kawamura, J. R. Ehteshami, and S. A. Rodeo Indomethacin and Celecoxib Impair Rotator Cuff Tendon-to-Bone Healing Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2006; 34(3): 362 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Reuben, D. Ablett, and R. Kaye High dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs compromise spinal fusion: [De fortes doses d'anti-inflammatoires non steroidiens compromettent l'arthrodese vertebrale] Can J Anesth, May 1, 2005; 52(5): 506 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Reuben and E. F. Ekman The Effect of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition on Analgesia and Spinal Fusion J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 536 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Brown, M. M. Saunders, T. Kirsch, H. J. Donahue, and J. S. Reid Effect of COX-2-Specific Inhibition on Fracture-Healing in the Rat Femur J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2004; 86(1): 116 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Cole What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2003; 85(11): 2260 - 2269. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. M. Gajraj Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1720 - 1738. [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2002 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.