The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 84:148-150 (2002)
© 2002 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Ghost Surgery: The Ethical and Legal Implications of Who Does the Operation
Mininder S. Kocher, MD, MPH
Abstract
Case 1: A patient who is rehospitalized for complications
after shoulder arthroscopy discovers that his surgeons partner
performed the operation. The orthopaedists contend that they practice as
a "team," deciding who does the specific case
just prior to the operation1.
Case 2: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is performed by a resident.
The attending orthopaedist scrubs briefly and then leaves to perform
a simultaneous procedure in another room. The patient has a postoperative
complication2.
Case 3: Carpal tunnel release is performed by a resident, under
the supervision of an attending orthopaedist who has been present
for the entire case and who has introduced the resident as his assistant
in the informed-consent process. The median nerve is injured by
the resident3.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Wisner, D. A. Quillen, D. M. Benderson, and M. J. Green
Patient Attitudes Toward Resident Involvement in Cataract Surgery
Arch Ophthalmol,
September 1, 2008;
126(9):
1235 - 1239.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Chiong
Justifying Patient Risks Associated With Medical Education
JAMA,
September 5, 2007;
298(9):
1046 - 1048.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|