This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Debski, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fu, F. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Debski, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fu, F. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1344-1351 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Scientific Articles

Effect of Capsular Injury on Acromioclavicular Joint Mechanics

Richard E. Debski, PhD, I. M. Parsons, IV, MD, Savio L-Y. Woo, PhD and Freddie H. Fu, MD

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Richard E. Debski, PhD
I.M. Parsons IV, MD
Savio L-Y. Woo, PhD
Freddie H. Fu, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, 210 Lothrop Street, E1641 BST, P.O. Box 71199, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail address for R.E. Debski: genesis1{at}pitt.edu

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from the American Shoulder and Elbow Society. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our CD-ROM (call 781-449-9780, ext. 140, to order).

Background: Traumatic disruption of the acromioclavicular joint capsule is associated with pain and instability after the injury and may lead to degenerative joint disease. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of transection of the acromioclavicular joint capsule on the kinematics and the in situ forces in the coracoclavicular ligaments in response to external loading conditions.

Methods: Eleven fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were tested with use of a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The shoulders were subjected to three loading conditions (an anterior, posterior, and superior load of 70 N) in their intact state and after transection of the acromioclavicular joint capsule.

Results: Transection of the capsule resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) increase in anterior translation (6.4 mm) and posterior translation (3.6 mm) but not in superior translation (1.6 mm). The effect of capsule transection on the forces in the coracoclavicular ligaments was also significant (p < 0.05) in response to anterior and posterior loading but not in response to superior loading. However, differences were found between the forces in the trapezoid and conoid ligaments. Under an anterior load, the mean in situ force (and standard deviation) in the trapezoid increased from 14 ± 14 N to 25 ± 19 N, while the mean force in the conoid increased from 15 ± 14 N to 49 ± 23 N, or 227%. In contrast, in response to a posterior load, the mean in situ force in the trapezoid increased from 23 ± 15 N to 38 ± 23 N, or 66% (p < 0.05), while the mean force in the conoid increased only 9%.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: The large differences in the change of force in the conoid and trapezoid ligaments suggest that these ligaments should not be considered as one structure when surgical treatment is considered. Furthermore, transection of the capsule resulted in a shift of load to the coracoclavicular ligaments, which may render the intact coracoclavicular ligaments more likely to fail with anterior or posterior loading. The results of the present study also suggest that the intact coracoclavicular ligaments cannot compensate for the loss of capsular function during anterior-posterior loading as occurs in type-II acromioclavicular joint injuries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S.-J. Shin, Y.-H. Yun, and J. D. Yoo
Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Dislocation Using 2 Suture Anchors and Coracoacromial Ligament Transfer
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2009; 37(2): 346 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. M. Salzmann, J. Paul, G. H. Sandmann, A. B. Imhoff, and P. B. Schottle
The Coracoidal Insertion of the Coracoclavicular Ligaments: An Anatomic Study
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2008; 36(12): 2392 - 2397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. F. LaPrade, D. J. Wickum, C. J. Griffith, and P. M. Ludewig
Kinematic Evaluation of the Modified Weaver-Dunn Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2008; 36(11): 2216 - 2221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. D. Mazzocca, J. T. Spang, R. R. Rodriguez, C. G. Rios, K. P. Shea, A. A. Romeo, and R. A. Arciero
Biomechanical and Radiographic Analysis of Partial Coracoclavicular Ligament Injuries
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2008; 36(7): 1397 - 1402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. Wellmann, T. Zantop, A. Weimann, M. J. Raschke, and W. Petersen
Biomechanical Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Repairs for Complete Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2007; 35(6): 955 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. G. Rios, R. A. Arciero, and A. D. Mazzocca
Anatomy of the Clavicle and Coracoid Process for Reconstruction of the Coracoclavicular Ligaments
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 35(5): 811 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. D. Mazzocca, R. A. Arciero, and J. Bicos
Evaluation and Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 316 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. D. Mazzocca, S. A. Santangelo, S. T. Johnson, C. G. Rios, M. L. Dumonski, and R. A. Arciero
A Biomechanical Evaluation of an Anatomical Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 236 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
P. W. Grutter and S. A. Petersen
Anatomical Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Comparison of Reconstructive Techniques of the Acromioclavicular Joint
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1723 - 1728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. S. Costic, J. E. Labriola, M. W. Rodosky, and R. E. Debski
Biomechanical Rationale for Development of Anatomical Reconstructions of Coracoclavicular Ligaments After Complete Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2004; 32(8): 1929 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]