This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawamura, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rorabeck, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawamura, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rorabeck, C. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1333-1338 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Scientific Articles

The Porous Coated Anatomic Total Hip Replacement

A Ten to Fourteen-Year Follow-up Study of a Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Haruo Kawamura, MD, Michael J. Dunbar, MD, FRCSC, Paraic Murray, MCh(Orth), MSc, FRCSI, FRCSEd(Orth), Robert B. Bourne, MD, FRCSC and Cecil H. Rorabeck, MD, FRCSC

Investigation performed at the Division of Orthopaedics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Haruo Kawamura, MD
Michael J. Dunbar, MD, FRCSC
Paraic Murray, MCh(Orth), MSc, FRCSI, FRCSEd(Orth)
Robert B. Bourne, MD, FRCSC
Cecil H. Rorabeck, MD, FRCSC
London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada. E-mail address for R.B. Bourne: robert.bourne{at}lhsc.on.ca

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds have been received in support of this study.

Background: We previously reported our two and five-year results of arthroplasty with the Porous Coated Anatomic total hip prosthesis. We now report on the performance of this prosthesis at ten to fourteen years.

Methods: The results of 311 total hip replacements in which a Porous Coated Anatomic prosthesis was inserted without cement in 279 patients were analyzed prospectively. The average age of the patients at the time of the replacement was sixty-­one years (range, twenty to eighty-one years). Sixty-four patients (seventy-six hips) died postoperatively. Forty-five patients (forty-seven hips) were lost to follow-up, and four were excluded because of their medical condition. One hundred and sixty-eight patients (187 hips) were followed for ten to fourteen years (average, twelve years). Seventeen of those patients (seventeen hips) had a revision.

Results: The overall survival rate (with any revision as the end point) was 90.0% ± 5.4% at fourteen years, with an average Harris hip score of 85 ± 14 points. The prevalence of thigh pain was 36% (fifty-six of 157) in the late period (more than ten years postoperatively). Radiographs showed stable fixation, with bone ingrowth, of 83% (130) of the 156 acetabular components and 88% (137) of the 156 femoral components at the latest follow-up evaluation. Men had a significantly higher rate of femoral osteolysis than did women (p < 0.001). The rates of acetabular and femoral osteolysis associated with 32-mm femoral heads (49% [twenty-three] of forty-seven and 70% [thirty-three] of forty-seven, respectively) were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than those associated with 26-mm heads (26% [twenty-eight] of 109 and 30% [thirty-three] of 109, respectively). Despite this, revision (removal or exchange of components) was not directly related to head size; instead, it was related to polyethylene thickness.

Conclusions: There have been persistent problems with the Porous Coated Anatomic hip system, including thigh pain and an increasing prevalence of osteolysis with time. Revision because of aseptic loosening was related more to the thickness of the polyethylene liner than to the size of the femoral head. Femoral heads with a 32-mm diameter did not increase the risk for revision provided that an adequate thickness of polyethylene had been used.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
A. Marshall, M. D. Ries, and W. Paprosky
How prevalent are implant wear and osteolysis, and how has the scope of osteolysis changed since 2000?
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2008; 16(suppl_1): S1 - S6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
I. Milosev, R. Trebse, S. Kovac, A. Cor, and V. Pisot
Survivorship and Retrieval Analysis of Sikomet Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacements at a Mean of Seven Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1173 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. K. Sinha, D. S. Dungy, and H. B. Yeon
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Proximally Porous-Coated Femoral Stem
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2004; 86(6): 1254 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. B. Meding, E. M. Keating, M. A. Ritter, P. M. Faris, and M. E. Berend
Minimum Ten-Year Follow-up of a Straight-Stemmed, Plasma-Sprayed, Titanium-Alloy, Uncemented Femoral Component in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2004; 86(1): 92 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. H. Huo
What's New in Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 10, 2002; 84(10): 1894 - 1905.
[Full Text] [PDF]