The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1212-1218 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Growth and Development of the Pediatric Cervical Spine Documented Radiographically
Jeffrey C. Wang, MD,
Stephen L. Nuccion, MD,
John E. Feighan, MD,
Brad Cohen, MD,
Frederick J. Dorey, PhD and
Peter V. Scoles, MD
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine,
Los Angeles, California, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Jeffrey C. Wang, MD
Stephen L. Nuccion, MD
Frederick J. Dorey, PhD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at
Los Angeles School of Medicine, Box 956902, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6902
John E. Feighan, MD
Brad Cohen, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University,
11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106
Peter V. Scoles, MD
National Board of Medical Examiners, 3750 Market Street, Philadelphia,
PA 19104-3190
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support
of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not
receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement
to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial
entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits
to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other
charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are
affiliated or associated.
Background: The radiographic anatomy of the
cervical spine in children is complex and can be difficult to interpret.
The present study was undertaken to document radiographically the
growth and development of the cervical spine in a prospective, longitudinal
manner and to establish standard radiographic measurements on the
basis of findings in patients who were followed serially from the
age of three months until skeletal maturity.
Methods: The radiographic resources of the Cleveland
Study of Normal Growth and Development (Bolton-Brush Collection,
Cleveland, Ohio) were reviewed. From this large database, we identified
fifty boys and forty-six girls who had a sufficient number of radiographs
of the cervical spine for inclusion in our study. With use of a
computerized image analyzer, the growth and development of the atlantodens
interval, the diameter of the spinal canal, the Torg ratio, the
height and width of the second through fifth cervical vertebral
bodies, the height of the dens, and the ossification of the first
cervical vertebra were assessed on serial radiographs made from
the age of three months until skeletal maturity.
Results: Serial measurements of the atlantodens
interval, the anteroposterior diameter of the cervical canal, the
height and anteroposterior width of the cervical vertebral bodies,
and the height of the dens, made in normal, healthy children from
the age of three months to fifteen years, are presented in tabular
and graphic forms. The median Torg ratio was 1.47 for both males and
females primarily, and it reached values of 1.06 for males and 1.10
for females by maturity. The anterior arch of the first cervical
vertebra had ossified in 33% of the children by the age
of three months and in 81% of the children by the age of one
year. Closure of the synchondroses was completed in all children
by the age of three years.
Conclusions: The measurements presented in the current
study are important because they are the first, as far as we know,
to document the radiographic parameters of the cervical spine in
children who were followed longitudinally from before the age of three
years through the course of growth and development until skeletal
maturity.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. P. D. Wills and J. P. Dormans
Nontraumatic upper cervical spine instability in children.
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
April 1, 2006;
14(4):
233 - 245.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Sarwark
What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedics
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2003;
85(5):
976 - 981.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|