This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1182-1187 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

The Floating Shoulder: A Biomechanical Basis for Classification and Management

Gerald R. Williams, Jr, MD, John Naranja, MD, John Klimkiewicz, MD, Andrew Karduna, PhD, Joseph P. Iannotti, MD, PhD and Matthew Ramsey, MD

Investigation performed at the Shoulder and Elbow Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Gerald R. Williams Jr., MD
Penn Orthopaedic Institute, 1 Cupp Pavilion, Presbyterian Hospital, 39th and Market Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19104

John Naranja, MD
1608 Apple Way, Minot, ND 58701

John Klimkiewicz, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Road N.W., Washington, DC 20007

Andrew Karduna, PhD
Department of Physical Therapy, Allegheny University Hospitals, MCP-Hahnemann School of Medicine, Broad and Vine Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19102

Joseph P. Iannotti, MD, PhD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195

Matthew Ramsey, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, 2nd Floor, Silverstein Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

Background: The floating shoulder (ipsilateral fractures of the clavicular shaft and the scapular neck) is thought to be an unstable injury pattern requiring operative stabilization in most instances. This recommendation has been made with little biomechanical data to support it. The purpose of this study was to determine the osseous and ligamentous contributions to the stability of experimentally created scapular neck fractures in a cadaver model.

Methods: Standardized scapular neck fractures were made in twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders. Each specimen was mounted in a specially designed testing apparatus and secured to a standard materials testing device. In group 1 (six shoulders), resistance to medial displacement was determined following sequential creation of an ipsilateral clavicular fracture, coracoacromial ligament disruption, and acromioclavicular capsular disruption. In group 2 (six shoulders), resistance to medial displacement was determined following sequential sectioning of the coracoacromial and coracoclavicular ligaments.

Results: The average measured force for all specimens (groups 1 and 2) after scapular neck fracture was 183 ± 3.3 N (range, 166 to 203 N). The addition of a clavicular fracture (group 1) resulted in an average measured force of 128 ± 10.5 N (range, 83 to 153 N), which corresponds to only a 30% loss of stability. Subsequent sectioning of the coracoacromial and acromioclavicular capsular ligaments yielded an average force of 126 ± 9.1 N (range, 114 to 144 N), a 31% loss of stability, and 0 N, a complete loss of stability, respectively. Sectioning of the coracoacromial and coracoclavicular ligaments after scapular neck fracture (group 2) resulted in an average force of 103 ± 8.4 N (range, 89 to 118 N), a 44% loss of stability, and 0 N, a complete loss of stability, respectively.

Conclusions: Ipsilateral fractures of the scapular neck and the clavicular shaft do not produce a floating shoulder without additional disruption of the coracoacromial and acromioclavicular capsular ligaments. These and other unstable combined injury patterns are likely to be accompanied by substantial medial displacement of the glenoid fragment.

Clinical Relevance: Operative stabilization of ipsilateral fractures of the scapular neck and the clavicular shaft may not be necessary in the absence of concomitant injury to the coracoacromial and acromioclavicular ligaments characterized by marked medial displacement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 TraumaHome page
K. Theivendran, C. W McBryde, and S. N Massoud
Scapula fractures: A review
Trauma, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 25 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. J. DeFranco and B. M. Patterson
The Floating Shoulder
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2006; 14(8): 499 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
D. A. Wiss
What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 12, 2002; 84(11): 2111 - 2119.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. A. Egol, P. M. Connor, M. A. Karunakar, S. H. Sims, M. J. Bosse, and J. F. Kellam
The Floating Shoulder: Clinical and Functional Results
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2001; 83(8): 1188 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text]