The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1131-1143 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Revision Anterior Cruciate Surgery with Use of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autogenous Grafts
Frank R. Noyes, MD and
Sue D. Barber-Westin, BS
Investigation performed at the Cincinnati Sportsmedicine
and Orthopaedic Center and the Deaconess Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
Frank R. Noyes, MD
Sue D. Barber-Westin, BS
Deaconess Hospital, 311 Straight Street, Cincinnati, OH 45219.
E-mail address for S.D. Barber-Westin: westinsb{at}aol.com
Although none of the authors has received or will receive benefits
for personal or professional use from a commercial party related
directly or indirectly to the subject of this article, benefits
have been or will be received, but are directed solely to a research
fund, foundation, educational institution, or other nonprofit organization
with which one or more of the authors is associated. Funds were
received in total or partial support of the research or clinical
study presented in this article. The funding source was the Cincinnati
Sportsmedicine Research and Education Foundation.
Commentaries are available with the electronic versions of this
article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our CD-ROM (call
781-449-9780, ext. 140, to order).
Background: A prospective study was done to
determine the functional results, patient satisfaction, and graft
failure rate after fifty-seven consecutive revision replacements
of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of a bone-patellar
tendon-bone autogenous graft.
Methods: Fifty-four patients (fifty-five
operations) were followed in this study. Concurrent operative procedures
were performed during the revision procedure in thirty-seven knees
(67%). These procedures included repair of a meniscal tear
in twenty knees (36%) and reconstruction of deficient posterolateral
or medial ligament structures in seventeen knees (31%).
Nine knees (16%) had a high tibial osteotomy to correct
varus malalignment before the revision operation. The results were evaluated
with the Cincinnati Knee Rating System.
Results: There were significant improvements in
the scores for pain (p < 0.0001), activities of daily living
(p < 0.01), sports participation (p < 0.001),
patient satisfaction (p < 0.0001), and overall rating of
the knee (p < 0.0001). Thirty-three (60%)
of the replaced ligaments were functional, nine (16%) were
partially functional, and thirteen (24%) had failed.
Conclusions: Many knees (93%) had compounding
problems, including articular cartilage damage, prior meniscectomy,
loss of secondary ligament restraints, varus malalignment, and concomitant
ligament replacement or meniscal repair. Therefore, the results
were generally less favorable than those following primary operations.
The rate of graft failure was three times higher than our previously
reported failure rate after primary replacements of the anterior
cruciate ligament with a bone-patellar tendon-bone
autogenous graft. Even so, symptoms and functional limitations with
regard to daily and sports activities were found to have decreased
and patient satisfaction improved. We advocate correction of varus
malalignment prior to anterior cruciate procedures. Associated posterolateral
ligament deficiencies should be surgically corrected during anterior
cruciate procedures to prevent excessive loading on the graft from
abnormal lateral tibiofemoral joint opening. Meniscal tears, including
complex tears that extend into the avascular zone, can be concurrently
repaired successfully during the revision.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. Brophy, R. W. Wright, and M. J. Matava
Cost Analysis of Converting From Single-Bundle to Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med.,
April 1, 2009;
37(4):
683 - 687.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Noyes
The Function of the Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Analysis of Single- and Double-Bundle Graft Reconstructions
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach,
January 1, 2009;
1(1):
66 - 75.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Ahn, Y. S. Lee, and H. C. Ha
Comparison of Revision Surgery With Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Outcome of Revision Surgery Between Different Graft Materials
Am. J. Sports Med.,
October 1, 2008;
36(10):
1889 - 1895.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Denti, D. L. Vetere, C. Bait, H. Schonhuber, G. Melegati, and P. Volpi
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Causes of Failure, Surgical Technique, and Clinical Results
Am. J. Sports Med.,
October 1, 2008;
36(10):
1896 - 1902.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Diamantopoulos, O. Lorbach, and H. H. Paessler
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Reconstruction: Results in 107 Patients
Am. J. Sports Med.,
May 1, 2008;
36(5):
851 - 860.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Liden, T. Movin, L. Ejerhed, N. Papadogiannakis, E. Blomen, K. Hultenby, and J. Kartus
A Histological and Ultrastructural Evaluation of the Patellar Tendon 10 Years After Reharvesting Its Central Third
Am. J. Sports Med.,
April 1, 2008;
36(4):
781 - 788.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Battaglia II, F. A. Cordasco, J. A. Hannafin, S. A. Rodeo, S. J. O'Brien, D. W. Altchek, J. Cavanaugh, T. L. Wickiewicz, and R. F. Warren
Results of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery
Am. J. Sports Med.,
December 1, 2007;
35(12):
2057 - 2066.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Weiler, A. Schmeling, I. Stohr, M. J. Kaab, and M. Wagner
Primary Versus Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Prospective Matched-Group Analysis
Am. J. Sports Med.,
October 1, 2007;
35(10):
1643 - 1652.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Reach Jr., I. D. Dickey, M. E. Zobitz, J. E. Adams, S. P. Scully, and D. G. Lewallen
Direct Tendon Attachment and Healing to Porous Tantalum: An Experimental Animal Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2007;
89(5):
1000 - 1009.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Noyes and S. D. Barber-Westin
Posterolateral Knee Reconstruction With an Anatomical Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Reconstruction of the Fibular Collateral Ligament
Am. J. Sports Med.,
February 1, 2007;
35(2):
259 - 273.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. George, W. R. Dunn, and K. P. Spindler
Current Concepts Review: Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med.,
December 1, 2006;
34(12):
2026 - 2037.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ferretti, F. Conteduca, E. Monaco, A. De Carli, and C. D'Arrigo
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Doubled Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendons and Lateral Extra-Articular Reconstruction
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(11):
2373 - 2379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Salmon, L. A. Pinczewski, V. J. Russell, and K. Refshauge
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: 5- to 9-Year Follow-up
Am. J. Sports Med.,
October 1, 2006;
34(10):
1604 - 1614.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Noyes, S. D. Barber-Westin, and J. C. Albright
An Analysis of the Causes of Failure in 57 Consecutive Posterolateral Operative Procedures
Am. J. Sports Med.,
September 1, 2006;
34(9):
1419 - 1430.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Noyes, S. D. Barber-Westin, N. P. Thomas, R. Kankate, F. Wandless, and H. Pandit
Letter to the Editor * Authors' Response
Am. J. Sports Med.,
April 1, 2006;
34(4):
678 - 680.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Noyes and S. D. Barber-Westin
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Reconstruction: Results Using a Quadriceps Tendon-Patellar Bone Autograft
Am. J. Sports Med.,
April 1, 2006;
34(4):
553 - 564.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. P. Thomas, R. Kankate, F. Wandless, and H. Pandit
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a 2-Stage Technique With Bone Grafting of the Tibial Tunnel
Am. J. Sports Med.,
November 1, 2005;
33(11):
1701 - 1709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Noyes and S. D. Barber-Westin
Posterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Reconstruction, Part 1: Causes of Surgical Failure in 52 Consecutive Operations
Am. J. Sports Med.,
May 1, 2005;
33(5):
646 - 654.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Noyes and S. D. Barber-Westin
Posterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Reconstruction, Part 2: Results of Revision Using a 2-Strand Quadriceps Tendon-Patellar Bone Autograft
Am. J. Sports Med.,
May 1, 2005;
33(5):
655 - 665.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Medvecky and F. R. Noyes
Surgical Approaches to the Posteromedial and Posterolateral Aspects of the Knee
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
March 1, 2005;
13(2):
121 - 128.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. B. O'Neill
Revision Arthroscopically Assisted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Previously Unharvested Ipsilateral Autografts
Am. J. Sports Med.,
December 1, 2004;
32(8):
1833 - 1841.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Jagodzinski, V. Behfar, C. Hurschler, K. Albrecht, C. Krettek, and U. Bosch
Femoral Press-Fit Fixation of the Hamstring Tendons for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med.,
October 1, 2004;
32(7):
1723 - 1730.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|