This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rozental, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Parekh, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rozental, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Parekh, S. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:987-991 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

The Internet as a Communication Tool for Academic Orthopaedic Surgery Departments in the United States

Tamara D. Rozental, MD, Jess H. Lonner, MD and Selene G. Parekh, MD, MBA

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Tamara D. Rozental, MD
Jess H. Lonner, MD Selene G. Parekh, MD, MBA
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 2 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail address for T.D. Rozental: trozental{at}att.net E-mail address for S.G. Parekh: avataars@yahoo.com

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: The Internet’s appeal as an affordable, accessible medium for information transfer makes it a potentially useful tool for practicing physicians. In the past several years, Internet-based health-care companies have proliferated, and many medical centers have established individual web sites. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate academic orthopaedic surgery departments in the United States with respect to Internet visibility and content.

Methods: We reviewed existing web sites for the 154 departments or divisions of orthopaedic surgery currently accredited for resident education by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The study sample consisted of the 113 departments that had a web page listed in the FREIDA (Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database) database. Each web site was assessed with regard to its informational value in the categories of clinical services, resident education, and physician recruitment. In addition, three commonly employed browsing engines were used to search for individual web sites and to determine their ease of accessibility.

Results: In the category of clinical services, sixty-five (57.5%) of the 113 sites provided faculty listings and forty-nine (43.4%) provided office telephone numbers and locations. Only thirteen sites provided information on common orthopaedic conditions, and five had links to other patient-education sites. In the category of resident education, twenty-four sites (21.2%) had online academic schedules, but only two provided access to complete conferences or teaching files. In the category of physician recruitment, ninety-one provided a description of their residency program and fifty-four had information on the application process, but only twenty-six web pages offered detailed departmental statistics. In terms of accessibility, fifty-three programs (46.9%) were identified by one of three popular search engines, seventeen (15%) were identified by more than one search engine, and two (1.8%) were identified by all three.

Conclusions: Academic orthopaedic surgery departments in the United States underutilize the Internet as a source of clinical and educational services. In addition, existing orthopaedic web sites are difficult to access with use of popular search engines. Thus, academic orthopaedic surgery departments in the United States are missing a valuable opportunity to promote awareness of their institutions and to become educational resources for the community.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. M. Purvis, A. H. Alexander, T. A. Einhorn, and L. Y. Griffin
Symposium Evaluating the Flood of Orthopaedic Media and Marketing Information
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2005; 87(6): 1392 - 1398.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Dominant media: Internet or print?
David L. Nelson, MD
JBJS Online, 21 Aug 2001 [Full text]