The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1013-1022 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Strut-Autografting with and without Osteogenic Protein-1
A Preliminary Study of a Canine Femoral Head Defect Model
Michael A. Mont, MD,
Lynne C. Jones, PhD,
John J. Elias, PhD,
Nozomu Inoue, MD, PhD,
Taek-Rim Yoon, MD,
Edmund Y.S. Chao, PhD and
David S. Hungerford, MD
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore,
Maryland
Michael A. Mont, MD
Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Sinai Hospital, 2411 West
Belvedere Avenue, Suite 102, Baltimore, MD 21215. E-mail address: rhondamont{at}aol.com
Lynne C. Jones, PhD
John J. Elias, PhD
Nozomu Inoue, MD, PhD
Taek-Rim Yoon, MD
Edmund Y.S. Chao, PhD
David S. Hungerford, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University
School of Medicine, Good Samaritan Professional Building, 5601 Loch
Raven Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21239
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received
from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject
of this article. Funds were received in total or partial support
of the research or clinical study presented in this article. The
funding source was Grant 95-018 from the Orthopaedic Resident and
Education Foundation. Stryker Biotech (Hopkinton, Massachusetts)
supplied the osteogenic protein-1.
Background: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head
frequently leads to collapse of the articular cartilage and to disabling osteoarthritis,
which ultimately may necessitate joint arthroplasty. One treatment
method that has had moderate success is the so-called trapdoor approach,
which involves excavation of diseased (necrotic) bone followed by
bone-grafting. Augmentation of this procedure with various growth and
differentiation factors may improve the outcome. We developed a
canine model that mimics the clinical situation with trapdoor bone-grafting. The
objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the addition
of osteogenic protein-1 on healing following the trapdoor procedure
with strut-autografting.
Methods: Thirty-four skeletally mature dogs were
used in the experiment. After capsulotomy, a trapdoor was created
in the anterolateral surface of the femoral head and a 2-cm-diameter
subchondral area of bone was removed. In the phase-I experiments,
seven dogs had no treatment of the defect (Group I) and nine dogs
were treated with strut-grafting (Group II). In phase II, the procedure
was modified by collapsing the trapdoor into the created defect
intraoperatively in eighteen dogs, which were divided into three equal
groups: six untreated defects were left collapsed (Group III), six
were treated with bone graft (Group IV), and six were treated with
bone graft augmented with osteogenic protein-1 (Group V).
Results: Three of the seven femoral heads in Group
I (untreated defect) and one of the nine heads in Group II (grafting
without collapsing of the trapdoor) had evidence of cartilage collapse.
Inspection of sagittal slices and radiographs revealed an unfilled
residual defect in all Group-I heads, whereas all Group-II heads
were well healed. The mean normalized stiffness value was significantly larger
in Group II than it was in Group I. On visual inspection, depression
was noted in all of the femoral heads in Group III (untreated defect;
trapdoor left collapsed). In both Group IV and Group V (grafting
without and with osteogenic protein-1), the trapdoor cartilage appeared
to be essentially normal. Groups IV and V had more radiographic healing
than did Group III. The defects in Group V (grafting with osteogenic
protein-1) healed faster radiographically than did those in Group
IV (grafting without osteogenic protein-1).
Conclusions: Moderate-to-excellent healing was seen
both radiographically and biomechanically by four months in the
groups treated with grafting, with and without osteogenic protein-1,
whereas untreated defects did not heal.
Clinical Relevance: Symptomatic osteonecrosis of
the femoral head is a clinical challenge. The animal model in the
current study is a useful tool for the evaluation of methods to
treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Studies investigating additional
time-periods between implantation of osteogenic protein-1 and assessment
of results as well as different doses of osteogenic protein-1 are
warranted.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Chen, A. H. Schmidt, D. T. Tsukayama, C. A. Bourgeault, and W. D. Lew
Recombinant Human Osteogenic Protein-1 Induces Bone Formation in a Chronically Infected, Internally Stabilized Segmental Defect in the Rat Femur
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2006;
88(7):
1510 - 1523.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mont, L. C. Jones, and D. S. Hungerford
Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Ten Years Later
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2006;
88(5):
1117 - 1132.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mont, P. S. Ragland, B. Biggins, G. Friedlaender, T. Patel, S. Cook, G. Etienne, A. Shimmin, R. Kildey, D. C. Rueger, et al.
Use of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for Musculoskeletal Applications: An Overview
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2004;
86(suppl_2):
41 - 55.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Huo
What's New in Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 10, 2002;
84(10):
1894 - 1905.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|