The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1005-1012 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Patients Expectations of Knee Surgery
Carol A. Mancuso, MD,
Thomas P. Sculco, MD,
Thomas L. Wickiewicz, MD,
Edward C. Jones, MD,
Laura Robbins, DSW,
Russell F. Warren, MD and
Pamela Williams-Russo, MD, MPH
Investigation performed at the Outcomes Unit, Department
of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York,
NY
Carol A. Mancuso, MD
Thomas P. Sculco, MD
Thomas L. Wickiewicz, MD
Edward C. Jones, MD
Laura Robbins, DSW
Russell F. Warren, MD
Pamela Williams-Russo, MD, MPH
Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York,
NY 10021
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received
from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject
of this article. No funds were received in support of this study. This
study was conducted while C.A. Mancuso was a Robert Wood Johnson
Generalist Physician Faculty Scholar.
Read at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic
Surgeons, Orlando, Florida, March 16, 2000.
A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this
article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our CD-ROM (call
781-449-9780, ext. 140, to order).
Background: Patients expectations
of medical care are linked to their requests for treatment and to
their assessments of outcome and satisfaction. Our goals were to measure
patients" preoperative expectations of knee surgery and
to develop and test patient-derived knee expectations surveys.
Methods: An initial sample of 377 patients (mean
age, 54.6 18.2 years; 52% women) was enrolled in the survey-development
phase. One hundred and sixty-one (43%) of these patients
subsequently underwent total knee arthroplasty; seventy-five (20%),
cruciate ligament repair; eighty-five (23%), meniscal surgery;
and fifty-six (15%), surgery for another knee condition.
Preoperatively, these patients were asked open-ended questions
about their expectations of knee surgery. Their responses were grouped
with use of qualitative research techniques to generate categories
of expectations. Categories were transformed into specific questions
and were formatted into two draft surveys, one for patients undergoing total
knee arthroplasty and one for patients undergoing other surgical
procedures on the knee. A second sample of 163 patients (mean age,
55.1 17.5 years; 49% women) was enrolled in the survey-testing
phase, and they completed the draft surveys on two separate occasions
to establish test-retest reliability. Items were selected
for the final surveys if they were cited by 5% of the patients,
if they represented important functional changes resulting from
surgery, or if they represented potentially unrealistic expectations.
All selected items fulfilled reliability criteria, defined as a
kappa (or weighted kappa) value of 0.4, or were deemed to be clinically
relevant by a panel of orthopaedic surgeons.
Results: From the survey-development phase, a total
of fifty-two categories of expectations were discerned; they included
both anticipated items such as pain relief and improvement in walking
ability and unanticipated items such as improving psychological
well-being. Expectations varied by diagnosis and patient
characteristics, including functional status. Two final surveys
were generated: the seventeen-item Hospital for Special
Surgery Knee Replacement Expectations Survey and the twenty-item
Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Surgery Expectations Survey. Each
required less than five minutes to complete.
Conclusions: Patients have multiple expectations
of knee surgery in the areas of symptom relief and improvement of physical
and psychosocial function, and these expectations vary according
to the diagnosis. We developed two valid and reliable surveys that
can be used preoperatively to direct patient education and shared
decision-making and to provide a framework for setting
reasonable goals. Reexamining patients responses postoperatively
could provide a way to assess fulfillment of expectations, which
is a crucial patient-derived measure of outcome and satisfaction.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Rauscher and B. H Greenfield
Advancements in Contemporary Physical Therapy Research: Use of Mixed Methods Designs
Physical Therapy,
January 1, 2009;
89(1):
91 - 100.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. F. Henn III, L. Kang, R. Z. Tashjian, and A. Green
Patients' Preoperative Expectations Predict the Outcome of Rotator Cuff Repair
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2007;
89(9):
1913 - 1919.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Botte, D. D. D'Lima, M. J. Meunier, J. D. Bruffey, M. E. Brage, and C. W. Colwell Jr.
What's New in Orthopaedic Rehabilitation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2001;
83(12):
1920 - 1926.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|