This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skaggs, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tolo, V. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skaggs, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tolo, V. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:735-740 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Operative Treatment of Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children

The Consequences of Pin Placement

David L. Skaggs, MD, Julia M. Hale, MHS, PAC, Jeffrey Bassett, BA, Cornelia Kaminsky, MD, Robert M. Kay, MD and Vernon T. Tolo, MD

Investigation performed at Childrens Hospital, Los Angeles, California
David L. Skaggs, MD Julia M. Hale, MHS, PAC Jeffrey Bassett, BA Robert M. Kay, MD Vernon T. Tolo, MD Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Childrens Hospital, Mailstop 69, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90027. E-mail address for D.L. Skaggs: dskaggs{at}chla.usc.edu
Cornelia Kaminsky, MD Department of Radiology, Childrens Hospital, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90027
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from The Desert Golf Classic at Rancho Mirage. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: The commonly accepted treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children is fracture reduction and percutaneous pin fixation; however, there is controversy about the optimal placement of the pins. A crossed-pin configuration is believed to be mechanically more stable than lateral pins alone; however, the ulnar nerve can be injured with the use of a medial pin. It has not been proved that the added stability of a medial pin is clinically necessary since, in young children, pin fixation is always augmented with immobilization in a splint or cast.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of reduction and Kirschner wire fixation of 345 extension-type supracondylar fractures in children. Maintenance of fracture reduction and evidence of ulnar nerve injury were evaluated in relation to pin configuration and fracture pattern. Of 141 children who had a Gartland type-2 fracture (a partially intact posterior cortex), seventy-four were treated with lateral pins only and sixty-seven were treated with crossed pins. Of 204 children who had a Gartland type-3 (unstable) fracture, fifty-one were treated with lateral pins only and 153 were treated with crossed pins.

Results: There was no difference with regard to maintenance of fracture reduction, as seen on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, between the crossed pins and the lateral pins. The configuration of the pins did not affect the maintenance of reduction of either the Gartland type-2 fractures or the Gartland type-3 fractures. Ulnar nerve injury was not seen in the 125 patients in whom only lateral pins were used. The use of a medial pin was associated with ulnar nerve injury in 4% (six) of 149 patients in whom the pin was applied without hyperflexion of the elbow and in 15% (eleven) of seventy-one in whom the medial pin was applied with the elbow hyperflexed. Two years after the pinning, one of the seventeen children with ulnar nerve injury had persistent motor weakness and a sensory deficit.

Conclusions: Fixation with only lateral pins is safe and effective for both Gartland type-2 and Gartland type-3 (unstable) supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The use of only lateral pins prevents iatrogenic injury to the ulnar nerve. On the basis of our findings, we do not recommend the routine use of crossed pins in the treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. If a medial pin is used, the elbow should not be hyperflexed during its insertion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
T. Slongo, T. Schmid, K. Wilkins, and A. Joeris
Lateral External Fixation--A New Surgical Technique for Displaced Unreducible Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(8): 1690 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
R. Omid, P. D. Choi, and D. L. Skaggs
Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2008; 90(5): 1121 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. S. Kocher, J. R. Kasser, P. M. Waters, D. Bae, B. D. Snyder, M. T. Hresko, D. Hedequist, L. Karlin, Y.-J. Kim, M. M. Murray, et al.
Lateral Entry Compared with Medial and Lateral Entry Pin Fixation for Completely Displaced Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children. A Randomized Clinical Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2007; 89(4): 706 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
W. N. Sankar, N. M. Hebela, D. L. Skaggs, and J. M. Flynn
Loss of Pin Fixation in Displaced Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children: Causes and Prevention
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2007; 89(4): 713 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. Ramachandran, R. Birch, and D. M. Eastwood
Clinical outcome of nerve injuries associated with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: THE EXPERIENCE OF A SPECIALIST REFERRAL CENTRE
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2006; 88-B(1): 90 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
D. G. Stewart Jr., R. M. Kay, and D. L. Skaggs
Open Fractures in Children. Principles of Evaluation and Management
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(12): 2784 - 2798.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. Gadgil, C. Hayhurst, N. Maffulli, and J. S. M. Dwyer
Elevated, straight-arm traction for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2005; 87-B(1): 82 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
D. L. Skaggs, M. W. Cluck, A. Mostofi, J. M. Flynn, and R. M. Kay
Lateral-Entry Pin Fixation in the Management of Supracondylar Fractures in Children
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 702 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. M. Flynn, J. F. Sarwark, P. M. Waters, D. S. Bae, and L. Powers Lemke
The Operative Management of Pediatric Fractures of the Upper Extremity
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 12, 2002; 84(11): 2078 - 2089.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. F. Sarwark
What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedics
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2002; 84(5): 887 - 893.
[Full Text] [PDF]