The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 83:383 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Transtibial Amputees from the Vietnam War
Twenty-eight-Year Follow-up
Paul J. Dougherty, Lieutenant Colonel, United States Army Medical Corps
Investigation performed at the University of Louisville,
Louisville, Kentucky
LTC Paul J. Dougherty, United States Army Medical Corps
William Beaumont Army Medical Center, 5005 North Piedras, El Paso,
TX 79920. E-mail address: paul.dougherty{at}amedd.army.mil
The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not
reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the
Army, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government.
Although none of the authors has received or will receive benefits
for personal or professional use from a commercial party related
directly or indirectly to the subject of this article, benefits
have been or will be received, but are directed solely to a research
fund, foundation, educational institution, or other nonprofit organization
with which one or more of the authors is associated. Funds were received
in total or partial support of the research or clinical study presented
in this article. The funding source was the United States Army Medical Research
and Material Command, Fort Detrick, Maryland. Funding number DAMD
17-97-1-7148.
Background: The long-term functional outcome
following lower-extremity amputation is not well documented. I ascertained
the functional outcome and health status of patients who had sustained
a unilateral transtibial amputation as a result of a battlefield injury.
Methods: The records of 123 patients who had been
treated at Valley Forge Army General Hospital during the Vietnam
War for a diagnosis of isolated transtibial amputation due to a
battlefield injury were reviewed. Group 1 had an isolated transtibial
amputation, and Group 2 had at least one other major injury (another
major long-bone fracture of the lower extremity, burns covering >20% of
the body surface area, or a chest, abdominal, face, or head wound)
in addition to the transtibial amputation. Seventy-two (59%)
of the patients were enrolled in the study: twenty-eight were in
Group 1 and forty-four, in Group 2. Data were collected about employment
status, marital status, whether the patient had children, and use
of psychological support services. The Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey
was used to compare Group 1 and Group 2, individually and combined,
with age and gender-matched controls. Scaled scores for the two
groups (control and amputation) were compared with use of the Student
t test (two-tailed).
Results: Tripping a land mine or booby trap caused
65% of the injuries. The average age at the time of follow-up
was forty-eight years. The average time to follow-up was twenty-eight
years. Only the prevalence of the use of psychological support services
differed significantly between Groups 1 and 2 (21% compared
with 50%; p = 0.015). The results of the SF-36
health survey for Groups 1 and 2 were 81.6 and 58.2, respectively,
for physical function, 82.7 and 33.1 for role physical, 81.4 and
50.9 for bodily pain, 74.1 and 58.7 for general health, 67.1 and 51.5
for vitality, 89.1 and 70.4 for social function, 88.1 and 56.0 for
role emotional, and 79.5 and 64.0 for mental health. The average
scaled scores for Group 1 were similar to those for the age and
gender-matched controls, but the scores for Group 2 were significantly
lower (p £ 0.001) than those for the age and gender-matched
controls in all categories.
Conclusions: Group-1 patients led relatively normal
lives after sustaining a transtibial amputation in battle. The addition
of another major injury (Group 2) appears to have significant long-term
consequences with regard to SF-36 scores and the need for psychological
care.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. K. Potter, T. C. Burns, A. P. Lacap, R. R. Granville, and D. A. Gajewski
Heterotopic Ossification Following Traumatic and Combat-Related Amputations. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Preliminary Results of Excision
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2007;
89(3):
476 - 486.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Gajewski and R. Granville
The United States Armed Forces Amputee Patient Care Program
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
September 1, 2006;
14(10):
S183 - S187.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. K. Potter and C. R. Scoville
Amputation Is Not Isolated: An Overview of the US Army Amputee Patient Care Program and Associated Amputee Injuries
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
September 1, 2006;
14(10):
S188 - S190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. MacKenzie and M. J. Bosse
Factors Influencing Outcome Following Limb-Threatening Lower Limb Trauma: Lessons Learned From the Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP)
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
September 1, 2006;
14(10):
S205 - S210.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Transtibial Amputees from the Vietnam War
- William J Ertl, MD, et al.
- JBJS Online, 30 Dec 2003
[Full text]
- Dr. Dougherty responds:
- Paul J. Dougherty, M.D.
- JBJS Online, 30 Dec 2003
[Full text]
|