The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1695-1699 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Percutaneous Pinning of the Proximal Part of the Humerus
An Anatomic Study
Douglas J. Rowles, MD and
James E. McGrory, MD
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia
Douglas J. Rowles, MD
2144 Sunset Maple Lane, Chesapeake, VA 23323
James E. McGrory, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Naval Medical Center, Charette
Health Care Center, 27 Effingham Street, Portsmouth, VA 23708-3714
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support
of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not
receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement
to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial
entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits
to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other
charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are
affiliated or associated.
Background: Closed reduction and percutaneous
pinning of unstable proximal humeral fractures is a well-described
technique with some theoretical advantages over open techniques.
To our knowledge, the risk of injury to neurovascular structures
from percutaneous pinning of the proximal part of the humerus has not
been studied. We sought to quantify this risk using a cadaveric
model.
Methods: In ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders,
the intact proximal part of the humerus was pinned under fluoroscopic
guidance with use of an identical published technique. A total of
five 2.5-mm terminally threaded AO pins, including two lateral, one
anterior, and two greater tuberosity pins, were used in each shoulder.
The specimens were then dissected to determine the distance of each
pin from adjacent neurovascular structures as well as key anatomic
relationships.
Results: The proximal lateral pins were located
at a mean distance of 3 mm from the anterior branch of the axillary
nerve. Four of the twenty lateral pins were noted to penetrate the
articular cartilage of the humeral head. The anterior pins were
located at a mean distance of 2 mm from the tendon of the long head of
the biceps (perforating the tendon in three specimens) and of 11
mm from the cephalic vein (perforating the vein in one specimen).
The proximal tuberosity pins were located at a mean distance of
6 and 7 mm from the axillary nerve and the posterior humeral circumflex
artery (tenting the structures in two specimens with internal rotation),
respectively. These pins moved away from the nerve with external
rotation of the humerus.
Conclusions: The technique used in this study may
be associated with a risk of injury to important anatomic structures
about the shoulder. Lateral pins should be distal enough to avoid
injury to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve, and multiple
fluoroscopic views should be obtained to avoid penetration of the humeral
head cartilage. There may be a risk of injury to the cephalic vein,
the biceps tendon, and the musculocutaneous nerve with use of anterior
pins, and these pins should be employed with caution. Greater tuberosity
pins should be placed with the arm in external rotation, should
be aimed for a point 20 mm from the inferior aspect of the humeral
head, and should not overpenetrate the cortex.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JBJS:
- Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures Based on Current Literature
- Shane J. Nho, Robert H. Brophy, Joseph U. Barker, Charles N. Cornell, and John D. MacGillivray
JBJS 2007 89: 44-58.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. O. Anglen, M. T. Archdeacon, L. K. Cannada, and D. Herscovici Jr.
Avoiding Complications in the Treatment of Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2008;
90(7):
1580 - 1589.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Nho, R. H. Brophy, J. U. Barker, C. N. Cornell, and J. D. MacGillivray
Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures Based on Current Literature
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2007;
89(suppl_3):
44 - 58.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Dimakopoulos, G. Kasimatis, and A. Panagopoulos
Transosseous Suture Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2007;
89(8):
1700 - 1709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Cetik, M. Uslu, H. I. Acar, A. Comert, I. Tekdemir, and H. Cift
Is There a Safe Area for the Axillary Nerve in the Deltoid Muscle? A Cadaveric Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(11):
2395 - 2399.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Wiss
What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 12, 2002;
84(11):
2111 - 2119.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|