This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brighton, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Pollack, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brighton, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Pollack, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1514-1523 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Scientific Article

Signal Transduction in Electrically Stimulated Bone Cells

Carl T. Brighton, MD, PhD, Wei Wang, MD, Richard Seldes, MD, Guihong Zhang, PhD and Solomon R. Pollack, PhD

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Carl T. Brighton, MD, PhD
Wei Wang, MD
Richard Seldes, MD
Guihong Zhang, PhD
Solomon R. Pollack, PhD
Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (C.T.B., W.W., R.S., and G.Z.) and Bioengineering (S.R.P.), University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 424 Stemmler Hall, 36th and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6081. E-mail address for C.T. Brighton: ctb{at}mail.med.upenn.edu

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from NIH Grant 5-T32-AR07132 and Biolectron, Incorporated. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our CD-ROM (call 781-449-9780, ext. 140, to order).

Background: Electrical stimulation is used to treat nonunions and to augment spinal fusions. We studied the biochemical pathways that are activated in signal transduction when various types of electrical stimulation are applied to bone cells.

Methods: Cultured MC3T3-E1 bone cells were exposed to capacitive coupling, inductive coupling, or combined electromagnetic fields at appropriate field strengths for thirty minutes and for two, six, and twenty-four hours. The DNA content of each dish was determined. Other cultures of MC3T3-E1 bone cells were exposed to capacitive coupling, inductive coupling, or combined electromagnetic fields for two hours in the presence of various inhibitors of signal transduction, with or without electrical stimulation, and the DNA content of each dish was determined.

Results: All three signals produced a significant increase in DNA content per dish compared with that in the controls at all time-points (p < 0.05), but only exposure to capacitive coupling resulted in a significant, ever-increasing DNA production at each time-period beyond thirty minutes. The use of specific metabolic inhibitors indicated that, with capacitive coupling, signal transduction was by means of influx of Ca2+ through voltage-gated calcium channels leading to an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ (blocked by verapamil), cytoskeletal calmodulin (blocked by W-7), and prostaglandin E2 (blocked by indomethacin). With inductive coupling and combined electromagnetic fields, signal transduction was by means of intracellular release of Ca2+ leading to an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ (blocked by TMB-8) and an increase in activated cytoskeletal calmodulin (blocked by W-7).

Conclusions: The initial events in signal transduction were found to be different when capacitive coupling was compared with inductive coupling and with combined electromagnetic fields; the initial event with capacitive coupling is Ca2+ ion translocation through cell-membrane voltage-gated calcium channels, whereas the initial event with inductive coupling and with combined electromagnetic fields is the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. The final pathway, however, is the same for all three signals—that is, there is an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ and an increase in activated cytoskeletal calmodulin.

Clinical Relevance: Electrical stimulation in various forms is currently being used to treat fracture nonunions and to augment spinal fusions. Understanding the mechanisms of how bone cells respond to electrical signals—that is, understanding signal transduction and the metabolic pathways utilized in electrically induced osteogenesis—will allow optimization of the effects of the various bone-growth-stimulation signals.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. L. del Pozo, M. S. Rouse, J. N. Mandrekar, J. M. Steckelberg, and R. Patel
The Electricidal Effect: Reduction of Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas Biofilms by Prolonged Exposure to Low-Intensity Electrical Current
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2009; 53(1): 41 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. T. Brighton, W. Wang, and C. C. Clark
The Effect of Electrical Fields on Gene and Protein Expression in Human Osteoarthritic Cartilage Explants
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2008; 90(4): 833 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. R. Beck, G. O. Matheson, G. Bergman, T. Norling, M. Fredericson, A. R. Hoffman, and R. Marcus
Do Capacitively Coupled Electric Fields Accelerate Tibial Stress Fracture Healing?: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. E. Patterson, K. Kumagai, L. Griffith, and G. F. Muschler
Cellular Strategies for Enhancement of Fracture Repair
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_1): 111 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Z. Wang, C. C. Clark, and C. T. Brighton
Up-Regulation of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Cultured Murine Bone Cells with Use of Specific Electric Fields
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2006; 88(5): 1053 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. F. Muschler, C. Nakamoto, and L. G. Griffith
Engineering Principles of Clinical Cell-Based Tissue Engineering
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2004; 86(7): 1541 - 1558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
F. R. T. Nelson, C. T. Brighton, J. Ryaby, B. J. Simon, J. H. Nielson, D. G. Lorich, M. Bolander, and J. Seelig
Use of Physical Forces in Bone Healing
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2003; 11(5): 344 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]