The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1479-1483 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Retrospective Review of Eighteen Patients Who Underwent Transtibial Amputation for Intractable Pain
Nicholas Honkamp, BS,
Annunziato Amendola, MD,
Shepard Hurwitz, MD and
Charles L. Saltzman, MD
Investigation performed at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa,
the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, and
the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
Nicholas Honkamp, BS
Annunziato Amendola, MD
Charles L. Saltzman, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins
Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242
Shepard Hurwitz, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Box
159, Charlottesville, VA 22908
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support
of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not
receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement
to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial
entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits
to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other
charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are
affiliated or associated.
Background: Amputations are rarely performed
solely for pain relief because of concerns regarding the persistence
of pain and disability after the procedure. The purpose of this
study was to assess the outcome of below-the-knee amputations performed to
relieve intractable foot and ankle pain.
Methods: A chart review was conducted to identify
all below-the-knee amputations that had been performed for the treatment
of chronic foot and ankle pain by three orthopaedic foot and ankle
specialists at three institutions. The inclusion criteria included
(1) intractable foot or ankle pain as the surgical indication, (2)
failure of maximal medical therapy, (3) failure of prior surgical
reconstruction, and (4) a minimum follow-up period of twenty-four
months after below-the-knee amputation. Patients with diabetes mellitus,
peripheral vascular occlusive disease, or peripheral neuropathy
were excluded. Each participant completed a two-part questionnaire
with regard to the levels of disability, function, pain, and recreational
activity both before and after the amputation.
Results: Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria,
and eighteen completed the study. The study group included four
women and fourteen men who had an average age of forty-two
years (range, twenty-six to sixty-one years) and
were followed for an average of forty-one months (range,
twenty-five to eighty-five months) after the amputation.
When asked whether they would have the below-the-knee amputation
done again under similar circumstances, sixteen patients said yes, one
was unsure, and one said no. The same distribution was observed
when the patients were asked whether they were satisfied with the
outcome: sixteen said yes, one was unsure, and one said no. Disability,
pain, and recreational status were assessed with a 10-cm visual
analog scale. After the amputation, the patients reported a decrease
in both pain frequency (with the average score improving from 9.8
to 1.7; p < 0.0001) and pain intensity (with the average
score improving from 8.4 to 2.6; p < 0.0001). Ten patients
discontinued the use of narcotics, and seven decreased the level
and/or dosage. Three patients worked before the amputation,
and eight worked after the amputation. The average walking distance increased
from 0.3 to 0.8 mile (p = 0.0034).
Conclusion: In selected patients, a below-the-knee
amputation may be a good salvage procedure for intractable foot
and ankle pain that is unresponsive to all medical and local surgical
reconstructive techniques.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|