The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 83:86 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Primary Repair of Intraoperative Disruption of the Medial Collateral Ligament During Total Knee Arthroplasty
Seth S. Leopold, Major, MedicalCorps, UnitedStatesArmy,
Chris McStay, BS,
Karen Klafeta, BS,
Joshua J. Jacobs, MD,
Richard A. Berger, MD and
Aaron G. Rosenberg, MD
Investigation performed at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical
Center, Chicago, Illinois
Major Seth S. Leopold, Medical Corps, United States Army
Orthopaedic Surgery Service, William Beaumont Army Medical Center,
5005 North Piedras Street, 3rd Floor, El Paso, TX 79912.
Chris McStay, BS
Karen Klafeta, BS
Joshua J. Jacobs, MD
Richard A. Berger, MD
Aaron G. Rosenberg, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's
Medical Center, 1653 West Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612.
One or more of the authors has received or will receive benefits
for personal or professional use from a commercial party related
directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. In addition,
benefits have been or will be directed to a research fund, foundation,
educational institution, or other nonprofit organization with which
one or more of the authors is associated. No funds were received
in support of this study.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors
and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Defense
or the United States Government.
Background: Intraoperative disruption of the
medial collateral ligament during total knee arthroplasty is an uncommon
complication that is frequently treated by implanting a prosthesis
with varus-valgus constraint. To our knowledge, no data have been
published on primary repair or reattachment of the medial collateral
ligament and implantation of a minimally constrained posterior-stabilized
or cruciate-retaining prosthesis. This retrospective study evaluates
the hypothesis that satisfactory clinical results, at a minimum
of two years, can be achieved with immediate repair or reattachment
of the medial collateral ligament and without a constrained total
knee prosthesis.
Methods: Of 600 knees treated with primary total
knee arthroplasty, sixteen (in fourteen patients) sustained either
a midsubstance disruption of the medial collateral ligament or an
avulsion of the ligament from bone during the procedure. Preoperatively,
all patients had either neutral or varus alignment and an intact
medial collateral ligament. Midsubstance tears were treated with
direct primary repair, and avulsions of the ligament off the tibia
or femur were treated with suture-anchor reattachment to bone. All
patients wore a hinged knee brace, with no limit to the range of
motion, for six weeks postoperatively. Clinical and radiographic
data were gathered prospectively as part of a database that was
ongoing throughout the period of study; the cohort of patients was
assembled retrospectively by searching that database.
Results: No patients were lost to follow-up. The
mean duration of follow-up was forty-five months (range, twenty-four
to ninety-five months). The Hospital for Special Surgery knee scores
increased from a mean of 47 points (poor) preoperatively to a mean of
93 points (excellent) at the time of final follow-up. On physical
examination, no patient had a Hospital for Special Surgery score
in the fair or poor range and all patients had regained normal stability in
the coronal plane both at full extension and at 30º of flexion.
No patient required knee-bracing beyond the initial six-week postoperative
period. The range of motion at the time of final follow-up averaged
108º (range, 85º to 125º), although one knee required manipulation
under anesthesia to obtain a satisfactory range of motion. No arthroplasties
required revision. Radiographic examination demonstrated appropriate
limb alignment in all patients at the time of final follow-up.
Conclusions: Intraoperative disruption of the medial
collateral ligament can be treated with primary repair or reattachment
of the ligament to bone and postoperative bracing with good results;
this avoids the potential disadvantages associated with the use
of varus-valgus constrained implants.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Parratte and M. W. Pagnano
Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 1, 2008;
90(1):
184 - 194.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Morgan, V. Battista, and S. S. Leopold
Constraint in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
December 1, 2005;
13(8):
515 - 524.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Archibeck and R. E. White Jr.
What's New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 3, 2002;
84(9):
1719 - 1726.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|