This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norquist, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Matsen, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norquist, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Matsen, F. A., III
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:838 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Challenges in Evaluating Patients Lost to Follow-up in Clinical Studies of Rotator Cuff Tears*

Barbara M. Norquist, B.S.{dagger}, Benjamin A. Goldberg, M.D.{dagger} and Frederick A. Matsen, III, M.D.{dagger}

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. Funds were received in total or partial support of the research or clinical study presented in this article. The funding sources were the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation, the Bristol-Myers Squibb/Zimmer Institutional Award for Excellence in Orthopaedics, and the E. A. Codman Research Fund at the University of Washington.
{dagger}Department of Orthopaedics, University of Washington, Box 356500, 1959 N.E. Pacific Street, Seattle, Washington 98195-6500. E-mail address for F. A. Matsen, III: matsen{at}u.washington.edu

Background: Long-term follow-up studies are necessary to critically evaluate the outcome of a treatment intervention for a specific disorder. However, patients may cease participating in a long-term study and become lost to follow-up; thus, their current condition is unknown. The underlying characteristics that predispose a patient to become lost to follow-up are difficult to identify and control. Patients who are lost to follow-up may be contacted by telephone; however, the effect of administering a functional assessment questionnaire by telephone compared with that of mailing a questionnaire is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare patients who continued to respond to requests for follow-up with those who did not. A second purpose was to compare responses obtained by mail with those obtained by telephone interview.

Methods: Two hundred and twenty-four patients with a rotator cuff tear were enrolled in an ongoing study of shoulder function and general health. Self-assessment questionnaires were mailed to every patient at six-month intervals. Sixty-seven patients (30 percent) regularly responded to mailings (identified as responders in this study), fifty-five patients (25 percent) responded occasionally (these patients were not included in the analysis), and 102 patients (46 percent) ceased to respond and became lost to follow-up (identified as nonresponders in this study). This investigation was performed to determine: (1) the characteristics of nonresponders compared with those of responders, (2) the functional status of nonresponders as assessed with a questionnaire over the telephone, and (3) the effect of administering a self-assessment functional questionnaire by telephone compared with that of sending the same questionnaire by mail.

Results: Nonresponders tended to have lower initial scores for the mental health summary (p = 0.03) and for social function (p = 0.01), were less likely to have had surgery (p = 0.009), and were less likely to consume alcohol (p = 0.03). At the last known time when they completed the mailed questionnaire, nonresponders reported significantly worse shoulder function than responders (p = 0.0001). However, on telephone questioning the mean number of shoulder functions that the nonresponders indicated that they could perform was greater than the mean number documented on their last mailed questionnaire (p < 0.0001). In a random subgroup of responders, the mean number of functions that the patients indicated that they could perform when interviewed by telephone was significantly greater than the number indicated on their most recent mailed questionnaire (p < 0.01). The results obtained by telephone from this random subgroup of responders were similar to those obtained by telephone from the nonresponders.

Conclusions: There are differences between patients who continue to participate in a study and those who become lost to follow-up. Functional assessment questionnaires administered by telephone yield different results than the same questionnaires sent by mail. These considerations are relevant to the design, implementation, and interpretation of clinical studies in which functional questionnaires are used.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NEJMHome page
F. A. Matsen III
Rotator-Cuff Failure
N. Engl. J. Med., May 15, 2008; 358(20): 2138 - 2147.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 LupusHome page
A M Bertoli, M Fernandez, J Calvo-Alen, L M Vila, M L Sanchez, J D Reveille, G S Alarcon, and LUMINA Study Group
Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA) XXXI: factors associated with patients being lost to follow-up
Lupus, January 1, 2006; 15(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. M. Hettrich, E. Weldon III, R. S. Boorman, I. M. Parsons IV, and F. A. Matsen III
Preoperative Factors Associated with Improvements in Shoulder Function After Humeral Hemiarthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2004; 86(7): 1446 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. J. King, A. S. Malin, R. D. Scott, and T. S. Thornhill
The Fate of Patients Not Returning for Follow-up Five Years After Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2004; 86(5): 897 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]