The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:516 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Clinical Results of Modular Polyethylene Insert Exchange with Retention of Total Knee Arthroplasty Components*
Gerard A. Engh, M.D. ,
Lisa M. Koralewicz, M.P.H. and
Thomas R. Pereles, M.D.
Investigation performed at Anderson Orthopaedic Research
Institute, Alexandria, Virginia
*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received
from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject
of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, P.O. Box 7088, Alexandria,
Virginia 22307.
Augusta Medical Center, Suite 110, 93 Medical Center Drive, Fishersville,
Virginia 22939.
Background: Modular polyethylene inserts
have enabled surgeons to perform an isolated tibial insert exchange while
retaining well fixed components. The purpose of this study was to
review the results of insert revision and to clarify the role of
this option compared with that of revision total knee arthroplasty.
Methods: Fifty-six patients (sixty-three knees)
were managed with revision of a tibial polyethylene insert and retention
of well aligned and stable femoral and tibial components. The implants
had been in situ for an average of fifty-nine months
(range, two to 108 months) at the time of the insert exchange. The
inserts that were removed at the time of exchange were evaluated
with regard to wear of the articular surface according to the classification system
of Hood et al. and with regard to undersurface wear according to
the method described by Wasielewski et al. Forty-eight knees were
followed for an average of 7.4 years (range, 3.0 to 12.2 years)
after the insert exchange. Knees that did not require an additional
operation were considered to have had a successful exchange.
Results: Seven of the forty-eight exchanges
failed, at an average of fifty-four months, because of accelerated
wear of the new insert. All seven knees required complete revision
of all components. Of the twenty-two exchanges that were performed
because of severe wear of the primary insert, six (27 percent) failed
at an average of less than five years; thus, knees in which the
exchange was performed because of advanced wear were more likely
to fail again (p < 0.05). In addition, primary inserts that were
removed from knees in which the exchange procedure subsequently
failed had higher delamination scores than those that were removed
from knees in which the exchange was successful (p < 0.05).
Most of the primary inserts had substantial undersurface wear at
the time of the exchange procedure. Metallosis (thirty knees) and
osteolysis (nineteen knees) were unrelated to failure of the exchange.
Conclusions: An isolated revision of the tibial
polyethylene insert should not be performed when there is accelerated
wear of the insert with severe delamination and grade-3 or 4 undersurface
wear within ten years after the primary procedure. Because a variety
of patient-related, implant-related, and technical factors influence
polyethylene wear, the orthopaedist must consider multiple variables whenever
contemplating a limited revision.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Facebook  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
T. J. Gioe and A. V. Maheshwari
The All-Polyethylene Tibial Component in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2010;
92(2):
478 - 487.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Jamsen, H. Huhtala, T. Puolakka, and T. Moilanen
Risk Factors for Infection After Knee Arthroplasty. A Register-Based Analysis of 43,149 Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 1, 2009;
91(1):
38 - 47.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Maloney and A. Rosenberg
What is the outcome of treatment for osteolysis?
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
July 1, 2008;
16(suppl_1):
S26 - S32.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Patil, D. D. D'Lima, J. M. Fait, and C. W. Colwell Jr.
Improving Tibial Component Coronal Alignment During Total Knee Arthroplasty with Use of a Tibial Planing Device
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2007;
89(2):
381 - 387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D.R. Naudie, D. J. Ammeen, G. A. Engh, and C. H. Rorabeck
Wear and Osteolysis Around Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
January 1, 2007;
15(1):
53 - 64.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. P. Firestone and R. W. Eberle
Surgical Management of Symptomatic Instability Following Failed Primary Total Knee Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2006;
88(suppl_4):
80 - 84.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. W. Hanna and T. S. Thornhill
Thigh Mass and Lytic Diaphyseal Femoral Lesion Associated with Polyethylene Wear After Hybrid Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(11):
2473 - 2478.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. B. Collier, C. A. Engh Jr., J. P. Mcauley, S. D. Ginn, and G. A. Engh
Osteolysis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Influence of Tibial Baseplate Surface Finish and Sterilization of Polyethylene Insert. Findings at Five to Ten Years Postoperatively
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2005;
87(12):
2702 - 2708.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. M. Hutchinson, E. N. Parish, and M. J. Cross
Results of open arthrolysis for the treatment of stiffness after total knee replacement
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
October 1, 2005;
87-B(10):
1357 - 1360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Conditt, M. T. Thompson, M. M. Usrey, S. K. Ismaily, and P. C. Noble
Backside Wear of Polyethylene Tibial Inserts: Mechanism and Magnitude of Material Loss
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2005;
87(2):
326 - 331.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. H. Gonzalez and A. O. Mekhail
The Failed Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Etiology
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
November 1, 2004;
12(6):
436 - 446.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Kim, C. L. Nelson, and P. A. Lotke
Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Prevalence of the Complication and Outcomes of Revision
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2004;
86(7):
1479 - 1484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. K. Muratoglu, A. Mark, D. A. Vittetoe, W. H. Harris, and H. E. Rubash
Polyethylene Damage in Total Knees and Use of Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 21, 2003;
85(90001):
S7 - 13.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R. Rao, G. A. Engh, M. B. Collier, and S. Lounici
Tibial Interface Wear in Retrieved Total Knee Components and Correlations with Modular Insert Motion
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 10, 2002;
84(10):
1849 - 1855.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. O'Rourke, J. J. Callaghan, D. D. Goetz, P. M. Sullivan, and R. C. Johnston
Osteolysis Associated with a Cemented tModular Posterior-Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Design : Five to Eight-Year Follow-up
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 12, 2002;
84(8):
1362 - 1371.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. C. Babis, R. T. Trousdale, and B. F. Morrey
The Effectiveness of Isolated Tibial Insert Exchange in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 1, 2002;
84(1):
64 - 68.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. C. Babis, R. T. Trousdale, M. W. Pagnano, and B. F. Morrey
Poor Outcomes of Isolated Tibial Insert Exchange and Arthrolysis for the Management of Stiffness Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2001;
83(10):
1534 - 1536.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Archibeck and R. E. White
What's New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2001;
83(9):
1444 - 1450.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. L. Boskey
Musculoskeletal Disorders and Orthopedic Conditions
JAMA,
February 7, 2001;
285(5):
619 - 623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
