This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SAMMARCO, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SAMMARCO, V. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 82:394-400 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Os Acromiale: Frequency, Anatomy, and Clinical Implications*

VINCENT JAMES SAMMARCO, M.D.{dagger}, CINCINNATI, OHIO

Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland

Background: Os acromiale is present when the anterior portion of the acromion has one or more separate ossicles. Its frequency has been documented, in radiographic and anatomical studies, to be between 1 and 15 percent. Reports of os acromiale associated with subacromial pathology have been cited to imply that this entity is a cause of subacromial impingement; however, no study has demonstrated an increased frequency of os acromiale in patients with shoulder pain compared with the frequency in the general population. Inconsistencies in the literature concerning anatomy, development, and frequency prompted the current anatomical study. The purpose of this study was to better define the frequency and anatomy of os acromiale in the general population.

Methods: Two thousand three hundred and sixty-seven scapular bones from 1198 human skeletons from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection were studied for evidence of os acromiale. The sample consisted of specimens from 1033 men and 165 women, 843 of whom had been white and 355, black. The mean age of the individuals at the time of death was 44.7 years (range, eighteen to eighty-nine years). The frequency of os acromiale was noted, and the specimens were measured.

Results: There were 128 cases of os acromiale in ninety-six (8.0 percent) of the 1198 skeletons, and the condition was bilateral in thirty-two (33.3 percent) of the ninety-six skeletons. In twenty cases, the free fragment had been lost but it was assumed that a fragment had been present because the acromion was truncated. Os acromiale was more frequent in blacks than in whites (13.2 compared with 5.8 percent; p < 0.001) and in men than in women (8.5 compared with 4.9 percent; p = 0.09). The mean proportional length of the free fragment was 0.42 compared with the overall length of the acromion.

Care was taken to differentiate os acromiale from a normal immature acromion. Six skeletons demonstrated persistent acromial apophyses. All six cases were bilateral; seven fragments were fusing, and five were free. The oldest age at which a persistent normal apophysis was found was twenty-one years. The frequency of os acromiale in specimens from individuals who had been less than twenty-two years old was not significantly different from that in the remainder of the collection (p = 0.74). Twenty-one scapulae had a distinct circumferential line that was suggestive of an acromial joint, but the distal and proximal portions were solidly fused. However, the findings on plain axillary radiographs of sixteen of these specimens were indistinguishable from those of specimens with os acromiale.

Conclusions: An anatomical study, performed to better define the frequency and anatomy of os acromiale in the general population, showed that fused os acromiale, which has not been described previously, might be mistaken for a free ossicle in the clinical setting.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
C. A. Demetracopoulos, N. S. Kapadia, P. K. Herickhoff, A. J. Cosgarea, and E. G. McFarland
Surgical Stabilization of Os Acromiale in a Fast-Pitch Softball Pitcher
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2006; 34(11): 1855 - 1859.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
C. A. Kurtz, B. J. Humble, M. W. Rodosky, and J. K. Sekiya
Symptomatic Os Acromiale
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2006; 14(1): 12 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
D. H. Lee, K. H. Lee, R. Lopez-Ben, and E. L. Bradley
The Double-Density Sign: A Radiographic Finding Suggestive of an Os Acromiale
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2004; 86(12): 2666 - 2670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]