The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:1726 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
The Effects of Ulnar Axial Malalignment on Supination and Pronation*
Martin C. Tynan, M.D. ,
Stefan Fornalski, M.D. ,
Patrick J. McMahon, M.D. ,
Ali Utkan, M.D. ,
Stuart A. Gree, M.D. and
Thay Q. Lee, Ph.D.
Investigation performed at Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory,
VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, California
*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received
from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject
of this article. Funds were received in total or partial support
of the research or clinical study presented in this article. The
funding source was the Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research
and Development Grant, California Orthopaedic Research Institute,
John C. Griswold Foundation.
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory-VA Long Beach Healthcare
System, 5901 East 7th Street, Long Beach, California 90822. E-mail
address for T. Q. Lee: tqlee{at}med.va.gov
Background: Forearm fractures are common
injuries in both adults and children. Despite efforts to obtain
anatomical alignment, axial rotational malunions occur, resulting
in a decreased range of motion and a poor appearance. The objective
of this study was to quantify loss of forearm rotation after simulation
of ulnar malunions in supination and pronation.
Methods: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (mean
age at the time of death, 79.4 ± 2.8 years)
were used to quantify loss of forearm rotation after simulation
of axial rotational malunions of the ulna. First, maximum forearm
rotation in supination and pronation was measured at torques of
6.8, 13.6, and 20.4 kilograms-centimeter applied with use of a custom
jig. Following a midshaft ulnar osteotomy, a custom adjustable internal
fixation plate was used to simulate axial rotational malunions of
the ulna of 0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees in both directions. Measurements
in supination and pronation were then repeated at the prespecified
torques. Analysis of variance, with a p value of 0.05, was used
for statistical analysis.
Results: In all instances, a decrease in forearm
rotation after simulation of the ulnar rotational malunion was accompanied
by an increase in rotation in the opposite direction. Supination
and pronation were significantly influenced, whereas the total arc
of rotation was not affected by ulnar rotational malunion. At a
torque of 20.4 kilograms-centimeter, pronation malunions of 15,
30, and 45 degrees resulted in a mean loss of supination (and standard error
of the mean) of 5 ± 1, 11 ± 1,
and 20 ± 1 degrees, respectively, and supination
malunions of 15, 30, and 45 degrees resulted in a mean loss of pronation
of 4 ± 1, 10 ± 2,
and 18 ± 4 degrees, respectively. The ratio
of the simulated rotational malunion to the loss of motion was larger
than one.
Conclusions: Ulnar rotational malunions do not
lead to a significant change in the total arc of forearm rotation.
Instead, loss of motion in one direction is accompanied by increased
motion in the opposite direction. Even with a 45-degree ulnar rotational malunion,
forearm rotation decreases no more than 20 degrees.
Clinical Relevance: Ulnar rotational malunions
have less effect on forearm rotation than that reported after radial malunions.
This may be a consideration when treating forearm fractures or correcting
rotational malunion of the forearm.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Jupiter, D. L. Fernandez, L. S. Levin, and R. W. Wysocki
Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Disorders of the Forearm
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2009;
91(11):
2730 - 2739.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Wolf, G. S. Athwal, A. Y. Shin, and D. G. Dennison
Acute Trauma to the Upper Extremity: What to Do and When to Do It
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2009;
91(5):
1240 - 1252.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Mihata, M. R. Safran, M. H. McGarry, M. Abe, and T. Q. Lee
Elbow Valgus Laxity May Result in an Overestimation of Apparent Shoulder External Rotation During Physical Examination
Am. J. Sports Med.,
May 1, 2008;
36(5):
978 - 982.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Dumont, C. W.A. Pfirrmann, D. Ziegler, and L. Nagy
Assessment of Radial and Ulnar Torsion Profiles with Cross-Sectional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A Study of Volunteers
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2006;
88(7):
1582 - 1588.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Goldfarb, W. M. Ricci, F. Tull, D. Ray, and J. Borrelli Jr
Functional outcome after fracture of both bones of the forearm
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
March 1, 2005;
87-B(3):
374 - 379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Flynn, J. F. Sarwark, P. M. Waters, D. S. Bae, and L. Powers Lemke
The Operative Management of Pediatric Fractures of the Upper Extremity
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 12, 2002;
84(11):
2078 - 2089.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|