This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koralewicz, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Engh, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koralewicz, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Engh, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:1582 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Comparison of Proprioception in Arthritic and Age-Matched Normal Knees*

Lisa M. Koralewicz, M.P.H.{dagger} and Gerard A. Engh, M.D.{dagger}

Investigation performed at Anderson Orthopaedic Research Center, Alexandria, Virginia
*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
{dagger}Anderson Orthopaedic Research Center, P.O. Box 7088, Alexandria, Virginia 22307.

Background: Proprioception - one's ability to sense joint position and joint motion - is affected by factors such as age, muscle fatigue, and osteoarthritis. Most proprioception studies have focused on young active subjects or on recipients of total knee replacements. Few have involved a population with arthritic knees prior to total knee replacement or persons similar in age to patients with advanced knee arthritis who are to have total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of the present study was to determine (1) if proprioception in arthritic knees differs from proprioception in nonarthritic, age-matched, normal knees; (2) if, when proprioception in one knee is reduced by the presence of advanced gonarthrosis, it also is reduced in the contralateral knee irrespective of the presence of arthritis; and (3) if a person's grade of arthritis is associated with his or her level of proprioception.

Methods: This study compared the proprioception levels of a group of 117 patients who were scheduled for total knee arthroplasty because of severe arthritis (mean age, 67.9 years) with those of a control group of forty patients who were recruited from a hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation program and did not have knee arthritis (mean age, 68.3 years). We used a customized Biodex System 2 Multi-Joint Testing and Rehabilitation System to compare proprioception (the threshold to detection of passive motion) between the two groups.

Results: Middle-aged and elderly persons with advanced knee arthritis were significantly less able to detect passive motion of the knee than were middle-aged and elderly persons without knee arthritis. Patients who had arthritis in only one knee had a reduced ability to detect passive motion of both knees. There was no significant association between the radiographic severity of arthritis and the threshold to detection of passive motion in patients with advanced knee arthritis.

Conclusions: Knee proprioception in middle-aged and elderly persons with advanced knee arthritis is reduced in comparison with that in middle-aged and elderly persons without arthritis. Such loss of proprioception is independent of the severity of knee arthritis and may foretell the development of arthritis. When a patient has reduced proprioception with regard to one knee affected by arthritis, he or she also has reduced proprioception with regard to the contralateral knee, independent of the presence or severity of degenerative arthritis. When an investigator is evaluating changes in proprioception after knee arthroplasty, it is best to compare the knee with the patient's untreated knee rather than with age-matched controls.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Age AgeingHome page
A. Swinkels, J. H. Newman, and T. J. Allain
A prospective observational study of falling before and after knee replacement surgery
Age Ageing, March 1, 2009; 38(2): 175 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
V. J. Wright and B. C. Perricelli
Age-Related Rates of Decline in Performance Among Elite Senior Athletes
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 443 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ptjournalHome page
S. W Shaffer and A. L Harrison
Aging of the Somatosensory System: A Translational Perspective
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2007; 87(2): 193 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
W.-C. Li, R.-S. Yang, and J.-Y. Tsauo
Knee Proprioception in Patients with Osteosarcoma Around the Knee After Modular Endoprosthetic Reconstruction
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2005; 87(4): 850 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. B. Swanik, S. M. Lephart, and H. E. Rubash
Proprioception, Kinesthesia, and Balance After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Prostheses
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2004; 86(2): 328 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]