The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:1575 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Complications of Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon with the Modified Two-Incision Technique*
Edward W. Kelly, M.D. ,
Bernard F. Morrey, M.D. and
Shawn W. O'Driscoll, Ph.D., M.D.
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedics,
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received
from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject
of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
Read in part on Specialty Day of the American Shoulder and Elbow
Surgeons and at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic
Surgeons, Anaheim, California, February 8, 1999.
Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W.,
Rochester, Minnesota 55905. E-mail address for B. F. Morrey: morrey.bernard{at}mayo.edu
E-mail address for S. W. O'Driscoll: odriscoll.shawn@mayo.edu.
Background: The purpose of this paper is
to describe the complications that we encountered after using a
muscle-splitting two-incision technique to repair avulsed distal
biceps tendons.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review
of the results of seventy-eight consecutive anatomical repairs of the
distal biceps tendon performed through a muscle-splitting two-incision
technique at our institution between 1981 and 1998. Four of the
patients required a graft to restore length. The seventy-four tendons
that were repaired primarily through the modified Boyd-Anderson
approach were analyzed in detail and form the basis of this report.
Results: Complications developed after twenty-three
(31 percent) of the seventy-four repairs. The complications included
five sensory nerve paresthesias (three lateral antebrachial cutaneous
and two superficial radial nerve paresthesias) in five patients. A
temporary palsy of the posterior interosseous nerve developed in
one patient; it resolved in six months. Six patients complained
of persistent anterior elbow pain. Heterotopic ossification that
did not limit forearm rotation developed in four patients, a superficial
wound infection developed in three, one tendon reruptured, three
patients lost forearm rotation, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy
developed in one patient. No radioulnar synostoses were observed
in our series. Complications developed after ten (24 percent) of
the forty-one acute repairs (performed fewer than ten days after
the injury), six (38 percent) of the sixteen subacute repairs (performed
ten to twenty-one days after the injury), and seven (41 percent)
of the seventeen delayed repairs (performed more than twenty-one
days after the injury). The surgeon's experience with this procedure
had no apparent effect on complication rates.
Conclusions: Most of the morbidity from repair
of the distal biceps tendon can be attributed primarily to a delay in
the timing of the repair and secondarily to an extensive anterior
exposure. More importantly, radioulnar synostosis is rare following
the muscle-splitting modification of the two-incision technique,
which can be performed safely even by surgeons with limited experience
with this procedure.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Jobin, M. A. Kippe, T. R. Gardner, W. N. Levine, and C. S. Ahmad
Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Cadaveric Analysis of Suture Anchor and Interference Screw Restoration of the Anatomic Footprint
Am. J. Sports Med.,
November 1, 2009;
37(11):
2214 - 2221.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Freeman, K. R. McCormick, D. Mahoney, M. Baratz, and J. D. Lubahn
Nonoperative Treatment of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures Compared with a Historical Control Group
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2009;
91(10):
2329 - 2334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Heinzelmann, F. H. Savoie III, J. R. Ramsey, L. D. Field, and A. D. Mazzocca
A Combined Technique for Distal Biceps Repair Using a Soft Tissue Button and Biotenodesis Interference Screw
Am. J. Sports Med.,
May 1, 2009;
37(5):
989 - 994.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Cil, S. Merten, and S. P. Steinmann
Immediate Active Range of Motion After Modified 2-Incision Repair in Acute Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture
Am. J. Sports Med.,
January 1, 2009;
37(1):
130 - 135.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. R. Chavan, T. R. Duquin, and L. J. Bisson
Repair of the Ruptured Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review
Am. J. Sports Med.,
August 1, 2008;
36(8):
1618 - 1624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Henry, J. Feinblatt, C. C. Kaeding, J. Latshaw, A. Litsky, R. Sibel, J. A. Stephens, and G. L. Jones
Biomechanical Analysis of Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Methods
Am. J. Sports Med.,
November 1, 2007;
35(11):
1950 - 1954.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. O'Driscoll, L. B. J. Goncalves, and P. Dietz
The Hook Test for Distal Biceps Tendon Avulsion
Am. J. Sports Med.,
November 1, 2007;
35(11):
1865 - 1869.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Mazzocca, K. J. Burton, A. A. Romeo, S. Santangelo, D. A. Adams, and R. A. Arciero
Biomechanical Evaluation of 4 Techniques of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Repair
Am. J. Sports Med.,
February 1, 2007;
35(2):
252 - 258.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Idler, W. H. Montgomery III, D. P. Lindsey, P. A. Badua, G. F. Wynne, and S. A. Yerby
Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison of Intact Tendon and 2 Repair Techniques
Am. J. Sports Med.,
June 1, 2006;
34(6):
968 - 974.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- thank you
- Michael J. Brennan, MD
- JBJS Online, 16 Jul 2001
[Full text]
|