This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, S. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:1575 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Complications of Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon with the Modified Two-Incision Technique*{dagger}

Edward W. Kelly, M.D.{ddagger}, Bernard F. Morrey, M.D.{ddagger} and Shawn W. O'Driscoll, Ph.D., M.D.{ddagger}

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
{dagger}Read in part on Specialty Day of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Anaheim, California, February 8, 1999.
{ddagger}Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, Minnesota 55905. E-mail address for B. F. Morrey: morrey.bernard{at}mayo.edu E-mail address for S. W. O'Driscoll: odriscoll.shawn@mayo.edu.

Background: The purpose of this paper is to describe the complications that we encountered after using a muscle-splitting two-incision technique to repair avulsed distal biceps tendons.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the results of seventy-eight consecutive anatomical repairs of the distal biceps tendon performed through a muscle-splitting two-incision technique at our institution between 1981 and 1998. Four of the patients required a graft to restore length. The seventy-four tendons that were repaired primarily through the modified Boyd-Anderson approach were analyzed in detail and form the basis of this report.

Results: Complications developed after twenty-three (31 percent) of the seventy-four repairs. The complications included five sensory nerve paresthesias (three lateral antebrachial cutaneous and two superficial radial nerve paresthesias) in five patients. A temporary palsy of the posterior interosseous nerve developed in one patient; it resolved in six months. Six patients complained of persistent anterior elbow pain. Heterotopic ossification that did not limit forearm rotation developed in four patients, a superficial wound infection developed in three, one tendon reruptured, three patients lost forearm rotation, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy developed in one patient. No radioulnar synostoses were observed in our series. Complications developed after ten (24 percent) of the forty-one acute repairs (performed fewer than ten days after the injury), six (38 percent) of the sixteen subacute repairs (performed ten to twenty-one days after the injury), and seven (41 percent) of the seventeen delayed repairs (performed more than twenty-one days after the injury). The surgeon's experience with this procedure had no apparent effect on complication rates.

Conclusions: Most of the morbidity from repair of the distal biceps tendon can be attributed primarily to a delay in the timing of the repair and secondarily to an extensive anterior exposure. More importantly, radioulnar synostosis is rare following the muscle-splitting modification of the two-incision technique, which can be performed safely even by surgeons with limited experience with this procedure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. Henry, J. Feinblatt, C. C. Kaeding, J. Latshaw, A. Litsky, R. Sibel, J. A. Stephens, and G. L. Jones
Biomechanical Analysis of Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Methods
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1950 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. W. O'Driscoll, L. B. J. Goncalves, and P. Dietz
The Hook Test for Distal Biceps Tendon Avulsion
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1865 - 1869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. D. Mazzocca, K. J. Burton, A. A. Romeo, S. Santangelo, D. A. Adams, and R. A. Arciero
Biomechanical Evaluation of 4 Techniques of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 252 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. S. Idler, W. H. Montgomery III, D. P. Lindsey, P. A. Badua, G. F. Wynne, and S. A. Yerby
Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison of Intact Tendon and 2 Repair Techniques
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 968 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

thank you
Michael J. Brennan, MD
JBJS Online, 16 Jul 2001 [Full text]