The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:1426 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Evaluation of Periprosthetic Bone-Remodeling After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
The Influence of the Extent of Porous Coating*
Katsuyuki Yamaguchi, M.D. ,
Kensaku Masuhara, M.D., Ph.D. ,
Kenji Ohzono, M.D., Ph.D. ,
Nobuhiko Sugano, M.D., Ph.D. ,
Takashi Nishii, M.D., Ph.D. and
Takahiro Ochi, M.D., Ph.D.
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, Suita, Japan
*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received
from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject
of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaizuka City Hospital, 3-10-20,
Hori, Kaizuka, Osaka 597-0015, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Koseinenkin Hospital,
4-2-78 Fukushima, Fukushima-ku, Osaka 553, Japan.
§Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Medical
School, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita 565, Japan.
Background: Total hip arthroplasty changes
the levels of stress within the proximal part of the femur, and
the femur remodels adjacent to the prosthesis. The stem size and
the initial bone-mineral density around the distal portion of the
stem affect postoperative bone-remodeling after the insertion of
a fully porous-coated metal-cancellous prosthesis. The purpose of
this study was to evaluate the influence of the extent of porous
coating of this prosthesis on femoral bone-remodeling.
Methods: A longitudinal examination of sixty-one
hips in fifty-four patients was performed. Thirty-one hips in twenty-seven
patients with a fully porous-coated stem (Group A) and thirty hips
in twenty-seven patients with a proximally porous-coated stem (Group
B) were followed for twenty-four to thirty months. Periprosthetic
bone-mineral density was measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at
specific intervals after the operation.
Results: In both groups, the greatest loss of
bone-mineral density, compared with the initial (three-week) value,
was approximately 20 percent in zone 7 at twelve to eighteen months.
In other zones, bone-remodeling appeared to cease by twelve months. At
the last follow-up evaluation, the loss of bone-mineral density
in the distal and middle regions in Group A was significantly greater
than that in Group B (p < 0.01 for zone 3 and p < 0.05 for
zone 6). In contrast, with the numbers available, there were no
significant differences in loss of bone-mineral density in the proximal
regions (zones 1 and 7) between the two groups at any follow-up period.
Conclusions: The extent of porous coating affects
bone-remodeling in the distal periprosthetic region rather than in
the proximal region. The results in the present report are specific
to the particular implants that were studied.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kärrholm, C. Anderber, F. Snorrason, J. Thanner, N. Langeland, H. Malchau, and P. Herberts
Evaluation of a Femoral Stem with Reduced Stiffness : A Randomized Study with Use of Radiostereometry and Bone Densitometry
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 3, 2002;
84(9):
1651 - 1658.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Huo and S. M. Cook
What's New in Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2001;
83(10):
1598 - 1610.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|