The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:80-8 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
The Protective Effects of Meniscal Transplantation on Cartilage. An Experimental Study in Sheep*
ZOLTAN L. SZOMOR, M.D. ,
THOMAS E. MARTIN, D.V.M., PH.D., M.B.A. ,
FIONA BONAR, M.B., F.R.C.PATH., F.R.C.P.A. and
GEORGE A. C. MURRELL, M.B.B.S., D.PHIL., SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA
Investigation performed at the Orthopaedic Research Institute, St. George Hospital Campus, University of New South Wales, Sydney
Background: Meniscal loss may result in arthritis. The aim of this study was to establish a simple operative method for meniscal transplantation in a large-animal model and to determine whether meniscal transplantation provides protection of the articular surfaces, whether meniscal allografts have the same protective effect as meniscal autogenous grafts, and whether there is any rejection phenomenon associated with meniscal allografts.
Methods: Twenty-eight sheep were divided into four study groups, which were treated with (1) a sham operation (four sheep), (2) a meniscectomy (eight sheep), (3) a meniscal autogenous graft (eight sheep), or (4) a meniscal allograft (eight sheep). The meniscal transplant was secured with three suture anchors to the tibia. At four months after the operation, macroscopic and microscopic evaluations of the articular cartilage and the menisci of the sheep knees were performed in a blinded fashion.
Results: The group treated with the sham operation had no cartilage damage and had normal meniscal tissue. The meniscectomies resulted in significant macroscopic and microscopic damage to the articular cartilage in the medial compartment. The mean score (and standard error of the mean) for macroscopic damage to the cartilage in the group treated with the meniscectomy was 6.5 ± 0.8 points compared with 3.9 ± 0.7 points in the group treated with the autogenous graft and 4.3 ± 0.6 points in the group treated with the allograft (p < 0.05). The size of the area of damaged articular cartilage was reduced by approximately 50 percent in both groups treated with a meniscal transplant compared with the group treated with the meniscectomy (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the group treated with the autogenous graft and that treated with the allograft. The histological appearance of the meniscal autogenous grafts was within normal limits. Interestingly, all of the allografts had evidence of fibrinoid degeneration with areas of hypocellularity and cloning of chondroid cells.
Conclusions: These results suggest that meniscal transplantation provides noticeable although not complete protection against damage to the articular cartilage after a meniscectomy. The meniscal allografts were just as effective in providing this protection as were the meniscal autogenous grafts.
Clinical Relevance: If these results are applicable to humans, they would support the transplantation of meniscal allografts, but it may be necessary to pay special attention to isometricity of meniscal grafts.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
G. von Lewinski, D. Kohn, C. J. Wirth, and D. Lazovic
The Influence of Nonanatomical Insertion and Incongruence of Meniscal Transplants on the Articular Cartilage in an Ovine Model
Am. J. Sports Med.,
May 1, 2008;
36(5):
841 - 850.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. T. Kelly, H. G. Potter, X.-H. Deng, A. D. Pearle, A. S. Turner, R. F. Warren, and S. A. Rodeo
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation in the Sheep Knee: Evaluation of Chondroprotective Effects
Am. J. Sports Med.,
September 1, 2006;
34(9):
1464 - 1477.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Cole, M. G. Dennis, S. J. Lee, S. J. Nho, R. S. Kalsi, J. K. Hayden, and N. N. Verma
Prospective Evaluation of Allograft Meniscus Transplantation: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
Am. J. Sports Med.,
June 1, 2006;
34(6):
919 - 927.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. von Lewinski, T. Pressel, C. Hurschler, and F. Witte
The Influence of Intraoperative Pretensioning on the Chondroprotective Effect of Meniscal Transplants
Am. J. Sports Med.,
March 1, 2006;
34(3):
397 - 406.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Cook, D. B. Fox, P. Malaviya, J. L. Tomlinson, K. Kuroki, C. R. Cook, and S. Kladakis
Long-term Outcome for Large Meniscal Defects Treated With Small Intestinal Submucosa in a Dog Model
Am. J. Sports Med.,
January 1, 2006;
34(1):
32 - 42.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Alford and B. J. Cole
Cartilage Restoration, Part 2: Techniques, Outcomes, and Future Directions
Am. J. Sports Med.,
March 1, 2005;
33(3):
443 - 460.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Cole, T. R. Carter, and S. A. Rodeo
Allograft Meniscal Transplantation : Background, Techniques, and Results
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 9, 2002;
84(7):
1236 - 1250.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Wirth, G. Peters, K. A. Milachowski, K. G. Weismeier, and D. Kohn
Long-Term Results of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation
Am. J. Sports Med.,
March 1, 2002;
30(2):
174 - 181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Rath, J. C. Richmond, W. Yassir, J. D. Albright, and F. Gundogan
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: Two- to Eight-Year Results
Am. J. Sports Med.,
July 1, 2001;
29(4):
410 - 414.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. C. Murrell, S. Maddali, L. Horovitz, S. P. Oakley, and R. F. Warren
The Effects of Time Course After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Correlation with Meniscal and Cartilage Loss
Am. J. Sports Med.,
January 1, 2001;
29(1):
9 - 14.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
