This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ATLAS, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by SINGER, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ATLAS, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by SINGER, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:4-15 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Long-Term Disability and Return to Work Among Patients Who Have a Herniated Lumbar Disc: The Effect of Disability Compensation*

STEVEN J. ATLAS, M.D., M.P.H.{dagger}, YUCHIAO CHANG, PH.D.{dagger}, ERIN KAMMANN, M.S.{dagger}, BOSTON, ROBERT B. KELLER, M.D.{ddagger}, MANCHESTER, MAINE, RICHARD A. DEYO, M.D., M.P.H.§, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON and DANIEL E. SINGER, M.D.{dagger}, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

Investigation performed at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, the Maine Medical Assessment Foundation, Manchester, and the Center for Cost and Outcomes Research and Departments of Health Services and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle

Background: Low-back problems are one of the most frequent reasons for disability compensation claims by workers. However, the effect of Workers' Compensation status on the long-term outcome for workers with sciatica has not been studied in detail, to our knowledge. Therefore, we believe that it is important to describe the long-term outcomes for patients who have herniation of a lumbar disc and sciatica according to the Workers' Compensation status at the time of the preoperative consultation.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study of patients who had sciatica and were seeking care from specialist physicians in community-based practices throughout Maine. Among 440 eligible patients, 199 were receiving Workers' Compensation at the time of entry into the study (baseline) and 241 were not. Three hundred and twenty-six patients (74 percent) completed questionnaires at the time of a four-year follow-up. The outcomes that we assessed included disability compensation and work status as well as relief from symptoms, functional status, and quality of life.

Results: Patients who were receiving Workers' Compensation at baseline were more likely to be young, male, and employed as laborers. They reported worse functional status; however, the clinical findings for these patients were similar to those for patients who were not receiving Workers' Compensation. Patients who had been receiving Workers' Compensation at baseline were more likely to be receiving disability benefits at the time of the four-year follow-up compared with those who had not (27 percent of 133 compared with 7 percent of 189; p < 0.001); however, they were only slightly less likely to be working at the time of the four-year follow-up (80 percent of 133 compared with 87 percent of 190; p = 0.09). Operative management did not influence these comparisons, but it decreased symptoms and improved functional status. Patients who had been receiving Workers' Compensation at baseline also had significantly less relief from symptoms and improvement in quality of life than patients who had not been receiving Workers' Compensation (all p < 0.001). In multivariate models, Workers' Compensation status at baseline was an independent predictor of whether the patient would be receiving disability benefits after four years (odds ratio, 3.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 7.6) but was not an independent predictor of whether the patient would be working on a job for pay at the time of the four-year follow-up (odds ratio, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 1.2).

Conclusions: Even after adjustment for the initial treatment of the sciatica and for other clinical factors, patients who had been receiving Workers' Compensation at baseline were more likely to be receiving disability benefits and were less likely to report relief from symptoms and improvement in quality of life at the time of the four-year follow-up than patients who had not been receiving Workers' Compensation at baseline. Nonetheless, most patients returned to work regardless of their initial disability status, and those who had been receiving Workers' Compensation at baseline were only slightly less likely to be working after four years. Whether or not they had been receiving Workers' Compensation at baseline, patients who had been managed with an operation reported greater relief from symptoms and improvement in functional status at the time of the four-year follow-up compared with patients who had been managed nonoperatively, even though the outcomes with regard to disability and work status in these two groups were comparable.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. N. Katz
Lumbar Disc Disorders and Low-Back Pain: Socioeconomic Factors and Consequences
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2006; 88(suppl_2): 21 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
Supplemental Material
JAMA, April 6, 2005; 293(13): E1 - E3.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
I. Harris, J. Mulford, M. Solomon, J. M. van Gelder, and J. Young
Association Between Compensation Status and Outcome After Surgery: A Meta-analysis
JAMA, April 6, 2005; 293(13): 1644 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
R. A. Deyo and J. N. Weinstein
Low Back Pain
N. Engl. J. Med., February 1, 2001; 344(5): 363 - 370.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
R. A. Deyo
Pain and Public Policy
N. Engl. J. Med., April 20, 2000; 342(16): 1211 - 1213.
[Full Text]