The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:26-34 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Shoulder Arthroplasty with or without Resurfacing of the Glenoid in Patients Who Have Osteoarthritis*
GARY M. GARTSMAN, M.D. ,
TONI S. RODDEY, M.S., P.T., O.C.S. and
STEVEN M. HAMMERMAN, M.D., HOUSTON, TEXAS
Investigation performed at the Texas Orthopedic Hospital, Houston
Background: The indications for resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis of the shoulder are not clearly defined; some investigators routinely perform hemiarthroplasty whereas others perform total shoulder arthroplasty.
Methods: Forty-seven patients (fifty-one shoulders) who were scheduled to have a shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative osteoarthritis were randomly assigned, according to a random-numbers table, to one of two groups: replacement of the humeral head with resurfacing of the glenoid with a polyethylene component with cement (total shoulder arthroplasty [twenty-seven shoulders]) or replacement of the humeral head without resurfacing of the glenoid (hemiarthroplasty [twenty-four shoulders]). All patients received the same type of humeral component, and all operations were performed by or under the direct supervision of the same surgeon. The patients were followed for a mean of thirty-five months (range, twenty-four to seventy-two months) postoperatively. Evaluation was performed with use of the scoring systems of the University of California at Los Angeles and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.
Results: No difference was observed between the preoperative scores for the two groups of patients. Postoperatively, the mean scores with use of the University of California at Los Angeles system and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons system were 23.2 points (range, 10 to 31 points) and 65.2 points (range, 15 to 94 points), respectively, after hemiarthroplasty and 27.4 points (range, 9 to 34 points) and 77.3 points (range, 3 to 100 points), respectively, after total shoulder arthroplasty. With the numbers available for study, no significant difference was found between the two operative groups with respect to the postoperative score. (Thirty-five subjects per group would be needed, assuming an effect size of 0.60 and a power of 0.80.) Total shoulder arthroplasty provided significantly greater pain relief (p = 0.002) and internal rotation (p = 0.003) than hemiarthroplasty did. Total shoulder arthroplasty also provided superior results in the specific areas of patient satisfaction, function, and strength, although none of these differences were found to be significant, with the numbers available.
Total shoulder arthroplasty was associated with increased cost ($1177), operative time (thirty-five minutes), and blood loss (150 milliliters) per patient compared with hemiarthroplasty. To date, none of the total shoulder arthroplasties in the study group have been revised. Hemiarthroplasty yielded equivalent results for elevation and external rotation. Three of the twenty-five patients who had had a hemiarthroplasty needed a subsequent operation for resurfacing of the glenoid. The mean cost for the revision operations was $15,998.
Conclusions: Total shoulder arthroplasty provided superior pain relief compared with hemiarthroplasty in patients who had glenohumeral osteoarthritis, but it was associated with an increased cost of $1177 per patient.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Facebook  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
H. Rahme, P. Mattsson, L. Wikblad, J. Nowak, and S. Larsson
Stability of Cemented in-Line Pegged Glenoid Compared with Keeled Glenoid Components in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2009;
91(8):
1965 - 1972.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Wiater and M. H. Fabing
Shoulder Arthroplasty: Prosthetic Options and Indications
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
July 1, 2009;
17(7):
415 - 425.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Wirth
Humeral Head Arthroplasty and Meniscal Allograft Resurfacing of the Glenoid
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2009;
91(5):
1109 - 1119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Elhassan, M. Ozbaydar, D. Diller, L. D. Higgins, and J. J.P. Warner
Soft-Tissue Resurfacing of the Glenoid in the Treatment of Glenohumeral Arthritis in Active Patients Less Than Fifty Years Old
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2009;
91(2):
419 - 424.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. C. McCarty, R. G. Marx, D. Maerz, D. Altchek, and R. F. Warren
Sports Participation After Shoulder Replacement Surgery
Am. J. Sports Med.,
August 1, 2008;
36(8):
1577 - 1581.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. G. Krishnan, J. R. Reineck, R. J. Nowinski, D. Harrison, and W. Z. Burkhead
Humeral Hemiarthroplasty with Biologic Resurfacing of the Glenoid for Glenohumeral Arthritis. Surgical Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_2__Part_1):
9 - 19.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. Bailie, P. J. Llinas, and T. S. Ellenbecker
Cementless Humeral Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Active Patients Less Than Fifty-five Years of Age
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 1, 2008;
90(1):
110 - 117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. G. Krishnan, R. J. Nowinski, D. Harrison, and W. Z. Burkhead
Humeral Hemiarthroplasty with Biologic Resurfacing of the Glenoid for Glenohumeral Arthritis. Two to Fifteen-Year Outcomes
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 2007;
89(4):
727 - 734.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Rispoli, J. W. Sperling, G. S. Athwal, C. D. Schleck, and R. H. Cofield
Humeral Head Replacement for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2006;
88(12):
2637 - 2644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. I. Bohsali, M. A. Wirth, and C. A. Rockwood Jr.
Complications of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2006;
88(10):
2279 - 2292.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Wirth, R. S. Tapscott, C. Southworth, and C. A. Rockwood Jr.
Treatment of Glenohumeral Arthritis with a Hemiarthroplasty: A Minimum Five-Year Follow-up Outcome Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2006;
88(5):
964 - 973.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Boileau, R. J. Sinnerton, C. Chuinard, and G. Walch
Arthroplasty of the shoulder
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
May 1, 2006;
88-B(5):
562 - 575.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Copeland
The Continuing Development of Shoulder Replacement: "Reaching the Surface"
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 2006;
88(4):
900 - 905.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. K.Y. Lo, R. B. Litchfield, S. Griffin, K. Faber, S. D. Patterson, and A. Kirkley
Quality-of-Life Outcome Following Hemiarthroplasty or Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoarthritis. A Prospective, Randomized Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2005;
87(10):
2178 - 2185.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Bryant, R. Litchfield, M. Sandow, G. M. Gartsman, G. Guyatt, and A. Kirkley
A Comparison of Pain, Strength, Range of Motion, and Functional Outcomes After Hemiarthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2005;
87(9):
1947 - 1956.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. D. Martin, D. Zurakowski, and T. S. Thornhill
Uncemented Glenoid Component in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Survivorship and Outcomes
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
June 1, 2005;
87(6):
1284 - 1292.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Thomas, A. J. Price, R. A. Sankey, and M. Thomas
Shoulder hemiarthroplasty in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
May 1, 2005;
87-B(5):
672 - 676.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. V. Fehringer, B. Kopjar, R. S. Boorman, R. S. Churchill, K. L. Smith, and F. A. Matsen III
Characterizing the Functional Improvement After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 12, 2002;
84(8):
1349 - 1353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. S. Burkhart
A 26-Year-Old Woman With Shoulder Pain
JAMA,
September 27, 2000;
284(12):
1559 - 1567.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
