This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GERBER, C.
Right arrow Articles by NYFFELER, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GERBER, C.
Right arrow Articles by NYFFELER, R. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 81:1281-90 (1999)
© 1999 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Experimental Rotator Cuff Repair. A Preliminary Study*

CHRISTIAN GERBER, M.D.{dagger}, ALBERTO G. SCHNEEBERGER, M.D.{dagger}, STEPHAN M. PERREN, M.D.{ddagger} and RICHARD W. NYFFELER, M.D., DIPL. ING ETH/FIT{dagger}, DAVOS, SWITZERLAND

Investigation performed at the Laboratory for Experimental Surgery, AO/ASIF Foundation, Davos

Background: The repair of chronic, massive rotator cuff tears is associated with a high rate of failure. Prospective studies comparing different repair techniques are difficult to design and carry out because of the many factors that influence structural and clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to develop a suitable animal model for evaluation of the efficacy of different repair techniques for massive rotator cuff tears and to use this model to compare a new repair technique, tested in vitro, with the conventional technique. Methods: We compared two techniques of rotator cuff repair in vivo using the left shoulders of forty-seven sheep. With the conventional technique, simple stitches were used and both suture ends were passed transosseously and tied over the greater tuberosity of the humerus. With the other technique, the modified Mason-Allen stitch was used and both suture ends were passed transosseously and tied over a cortical-bone-augmentation device. This device consisted of a poly(L/D-lactide) plate that was fifteen millimeters long, ten millimeters wide, and two millimeters thick. Number-3 braided polyester suture material was used in all of the experiments. Results: In pilot studies (without prevention of full weight-bearing), most repairs failed regardless of the technique that was used. The simple stitch always failed by the suture pulling through the tendon or the bone; the suture material did not break or tear. The modified Mason-Allen stitch failed in only two of seventeen shoulders. In ten shoulders, the suture material failed even though the stitches were intact. Thus, we concluded that the modified Mason-Allen stitch is a more secure method of achieving suture purchase in the tendon. In eight of sixteen shoulders, the nonaugmented double transosseous bone-fixation technique failed by the suture pulling through the bone. The cortical-bone-augmentation technique never failed. In definite studies, prevention of full weight-bearing was achieved by fixation of a ten-centimeter-diameter ball under the hoof of the sheep. This led to healing in eight of ten shoulders repaired with the modified Mason-Allen stitch and cortical-bone augmentation. On histological analysis, both the simple-stitch and the modified Mason-Allen technique caused similar degrees of transient localized tissue damage. Mechanical pullout tests of repairs with the new technique showed a failure strength that was approximately 30 percent of that of an intact infraspinatus tendon at six weeks, 52 percent of that of an intact tendon at three months, and 81 percent of that of an intact tendon at six months. Conclusions: The repair technique with a modified Mason-Allen stitch with number-3 braided polyester suture material and cortical-bone augmentation was superior to the conventional repair technique. Use of the modified Mason-Allen stitch and the cortical-bone-augmentation device transferred the weakest point of the repair to the suture material rather than to the bone or the tendon. Failure to protect the rotator cuff postoperatively was associated with an exceedingly high rate of failure, even if optimum repair technique was used. Clinical Relevance: Different techniques for rotator cuff repair substantially influence the rate of failure. A modified Mason-Allen stitch does not cause tendon necrosis, and use of this stitch with cortical-bone augmentation yields a repair that is biologically well tolerated and stronger in vivo than a repair with the conventional technique. Unprotected repairs, however, have an exceedingly high rate of failure even if optimum repair technique is used. Postoperative protection from tension overload, such as with an abduction splint, may be necessary for successful healing of massive rotator cuff tears.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
H. J. Seeherman, J. M. Archambault, S. A. Rodeo, A. S. Turner, L. Zekas, D. D'Augusta, X. J. Li, E. Smith, and J. M. Wozney
rhBMP-12 Accelerates Healing of Rotator Cuff Repairs in a Sheep Model
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2008; 90(10): 2206 - 2219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Morse, A. D. Davis, R. Afra, E. K. Kaye, A. Schepsis, and I. Voloshin
Arthroscopic Versus Mini-open Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1824 - 1828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
O. Lorbach, F. Bachelier, J. Vees, D. Kohn, and D. Pape
Cyclic Loading of Rotator Cuff Reconstructions: Single-Row Repair With Modified Suture Configurations Versus Double-Row Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1504 - 1510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
S. A. Rodeo, H. G. Potter, S. Kawamura, A. S. Turner, H. J. Kim, and B. L. Atkinson
Biologic Augmentation of Rotator Cuff Tendon-Healing with Use of a Mixture of Osteoinductive Growth Factors
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2007; 89(11): 2485 - 2497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
M. C. Park, Y. Tuoheti, and E. Itoi
Letter to the Editor * Authors' Response
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1210 - 1210.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
H. Sano, T. Yamashita, I. Wakabayashi, and E. Itoi
Stress Distribution in the Supraspinatus Tendon After Tendon Repair: Suture Anchors Versus Transosseous Suture Fixation
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2007; 35(4): 542 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. D. Smith, S. Alexander, A. M. Hill, P. E. Huijsmans, A. M.J. Bull, A. A. Amis, J. F. De Beer, and A. L. Wallace
A Biomechanical Comparison of Single and Double-Row Fixation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2006; 88(11): 2425 - 2431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
A. K. Koganti, G. J. Adamson, C. S. Gregersen, M. M. Pink, and J. A. Shankwiler
Biomechanical Comparison of Traditional and Locked Suture Configurations for Arthroscopic Repairs of the Rotator Cuff
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2006; 34(11): 1832 - 1838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
P. J. Millett, R. B. Wilcox III, J. D. O'Holleran, and J. J. P. Warner
Rehabilitation of the rotator cuff: an evaluation-based approach.
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., October 1, 2006; 14(10): 599 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. Gerber, S. D. Pennington, E. H. Yian, C. A.W. Pfirrmann, C. M.L. Werner, and M. A. Zumstein
Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Surgical Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2006; 88(1_suppl_2): 170 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
D. B. Cohen, S. Kawamura, J. R. Ehteshami, and S. A. Rodeo
Indomethacin and Celecoxib Impair Rotator Cuff Tendon-to-Bone Healing
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2006; 34(3): 362 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
B. Fuchs, M. K. Gilbart, J. Hodler, and C. Gerber
Clinical and Structural Results of Open Repair of an Isolated One-Tendon Tear of the Rotator Cuff
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. B. Ma, L. Comerford, J. Wilson, and C. M. Puttlitz
Biomechanical Evaluation of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs: Double-Row Compared with Single-Row Fixation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 403 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
T. F. Schlegel, R. J. Hawkins, C. W. Lewis, T. Motta, and A. S. Turner
The Effects of Augmentation With Swine Small Intestine Submucosa on Tendon Healing Under Tension: Histologic and Mechanical Evaluations in Sheep
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 275 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
E. G. McFarland, H. B. Park, E. Keyurapan, H. S. Gill, and H. S. Selhi
Suture Anchors and Tacks for Shoulder Surgery, Part 1: Biology and Biomechanics
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2005; 33(12): 1918 - 1923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
C. S. Ahmad, A. M. Stewart, R. Izquierdo, and L. U. Bigliani
Tendon-Bone Interface Motion in Transosseous Suture and Suture Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1667 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. Gerber, E. H. Yian, C. A.W. Pfirrmann, M. A. Zumstein, and C. M.L. Werner
Subscapularis Muscle Function and Structure After Total Shoulder Replacement with Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy and Repair
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2005; 87(8): 1739 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
T. D. Boehm, A. Werner, S. Radtke, T. Mueller, S. Kirschner, and F. Gohlke
The effect of suture materials and techniques on the outcome of repair of the rotator cuff: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED STUDY
J Bone Joint Surg Br, June 1, 2005; 87-B(6): 819 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. Boileau, N. Brassart, D. J. Watkinson, M. Carles, A. M. Hatzidakis, and S. G. Krishnan
Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Tears of the Supraspinatus: Does the Tendon Really Heal?
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2005; 87(6): 1229 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. C. Kreuz, A. Remiger, A. Lahm, G. Herget, and A. Gachter
Comparison of total and partial traumatic tears of the subscapularis tendon
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2005; 87-B(3): 348 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
S. Klepps, J. Bishop, J. Lin, O. Cahlon, A. Strauss, P. Hayes, and E. L. Flatow
Prospective Evaluation of the Effect of Rotator Cuff Integrity on the Outcome of Open Rotator Cuff Repairs
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 32(7): 1716 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. B. Ma, J. D. MacGillivray, J. Clabeaux, S. Lee, and J. C. Otis
Biomechanical Evaluation of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Stitches
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2004; 86(6): 1211 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
S. H. Coleman, S. Fealy, J. R. Ehteshami, J. D. MacGillivray, D. W. Altchek, R. F. Warren, and A. S. Turner
Chronic Rotator Cuff Injury and Repair Model in Sheep
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2003; 85(12): 2391 - 2402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
B. Jost, G. J. Puskas, A. Lustenberger, and C. Gerber
Outcome of Pectoralis Major Transfer for the Treatment of Irreparable Subscapularis Tears
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2003; 85(10): 1944 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
R. L. Waltrip, N. Zheng, J. R. Dugas, and J. R. Andrews
Rotator Cuff Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison of Three Techniques
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2003; 31(4): 493 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. Yamaguchi, W. N. Levine, G. Marra, L. M. Galatz, S. Klepps, and E. Flatow
Transitioning to Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: The Pros and Cons
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 17, 2003; 85(1): 144 - 155.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
A. G. Schneeberger, A. von Roll, F. Kalberer, H. A.C. Jacob, and C. Gerber
Mechanical Strength of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques: An in Vitro Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 9, 2002; 84(12): 2152 - 2160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. Yamaguchi
Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair : An Updated Perspective
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2001; 83(5): 764 - 772.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
L. M. Dejardin, S. P. Arnoczky, B. J. Ewers, R. C. Haut, and R. B. Clarke
Tissue-Engineered Rotator Cuff Tendon Using Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa: Histologic and Mechanical Evaluation in Dogs
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2001; 29(2): 175 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
B. JOST, C. W. A. PFIRRMANN, and C. GERBER
Clinical Outcome After Structural Failure of Rotator Cuff Repairs
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2000; 82(3): 304 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text]