This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DONAHUE, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by SHARKEY, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DONAHUE, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by SHARKEY, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 81:1236-44 (1999)
© 1999 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Strains in the Metatarsals During the Stance Phase of Gait: Implications for Stress Fractures*

SETH W. DONAHUE, PH.D.{dagger} and NEIL A. SHARKEY, PH.D.{ddagger}, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA

Investigation performed at Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of California, Davis, Sacramento

Background: Stress fractures of the metatarsals are common overuse injuries in athletes and military cadets, yet their etiology remains unclear. In vitro, high bone strains have been associated with the accumulation of microdamage and shortened fatigue life. It is therefore postulated that stress fractures in vivo are caused by elevated strains, which lead to the accumulation of excessive damage. We used a cadaver model to test the hypothesis that strains in the metatarsals increase with simulated muscle fatigue and plantar fasciotomy. Methods: A dynamic gait simulator was used to load fifteen cadaveric feet during the entire stance phase of gait under conditions simulating normal walking, walking with fatigue of the auxiliary plantar flexors, and walking after a plantar fasciotomy. Strains were measured, with use of axial strain-gauges, in the dorsal, medial, and lateral aspects of the diaphysis of the second and fifth metatarsals as well as in the proximal metaphysis of the fifth metatarsal. Results: When the feet were loaded under normal walking conditions, the mean peak strain in the dorsal aspect of the second metatarsal (-1897 microstrain) was more than twice that in the medial aspect of the fifth metatarsal (-908 microstrain). Simulated muscle fatigue significantly increased peak strain in the second metatarsal and decreased peak strain in the fifth metatarsal. Release of the plantar fascia caused significant alterations in strain in both metatarsal bones; these alterations were greater than those caused by muscle fatigue. After the plantar fasciotomy, the mean peak strain in the dorsal aspect of the second metatarsal (-3797 microstrain) was twice that under normal walking conditions. Conclusions: The peak axial strain in the diaphysis of the second metatarsal is significantly (p < 0.0001) higher than that in the diaphysis of the fifth metatarsal during normal gait. The plantar fascia and the auxiliary plantar flexors are important for maintaining normal strains in the metatarsals during gait. Clinical Relevance: Higher strains in the diaphysis of the second metatarsal may explain why stress fractures are more common in this region than they are in the fifth metatarsal. Elevated strains in the metatarsals due to muscle fatigue or loss of function of the plantar fascia may contribute to the development of metatarsalgia and stress fractures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
B. Chuckpaiwong, C. Cook, R. Pietrobon, and J. A Nunley
Second metatarsal stress fracture in sport: comparative risk factors between proximal and non-proximal locations
Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2007; 41(8): 510 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Rheum DisHome page
S Sangle, D P D'Cruz, M A Khamashta, and G R V Hughes
Antiphospholipid antibodies, systemic lupus erythematosus, and non-traumatic metatarsal fractures
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2004; 63(10): 1241 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
A. Erdemir, A. J. Hamel, A. R. Fauth, S. J. Piazza, and N. A. Sharkey
Dynamic Loading of the Plantar Aponeurosis in Walking
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2004; 86(3): 546 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]