This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WEBER, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by MORREY, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WEBER, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by MORREY, B. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 81:1111-9 (1999)
© 1999 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Osteoid Osteoma of the Elbow: A Diagnostic Challenge*

KRISTY L. WEBER, M.D.{dagger}, HOUSTON, TEXAS and BERNARD F. MORREY, M.D.{ddagger}, ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

Investigation performed at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Background: Osteoid osteoma is a painful benign neoplasm that is rarely found in the elbow region. Methods: The study included fourteen patients, and we believe that this is the largest reported series of patients with osteoid osteoma of the elbow evaluated at one institution. Most of the patients had had symptoms for a prolonged period and had had multiple invasive procedures before an accurate diagnosis was made. Although findings on physical examination generally are nonspecific and are not always accurate in localizing the lesion, plain tomograms and computed tomography scans were most helpful in identifying the nidus in the present study. Thirteen of the patients had limited motion of the elbow before the definitive diagnosis was made, and ten of these thirteen had a mean flexion contracture of 38 degrees. Results: Removal of the nidus resulted in relief of pain and improvement in the range of motion of the elbow in all fourteen patients. A persistent postoperative flexion contracture was more common in the patients who had had a previous arthrotomy of the elbow than in those who had not had that procedure. Conclusions: It is important to recognize this uncommon entity to avoid the morbidity associated with a prolonged delay in diagnosis. Because the symptoms resolve after excision of the lesion, the surgeon can avoid unnecessary soft-tissue dissection and release of the contracture.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Journal of RheumatologyHome page
M. SUSA, K. YAMAUCHI, M. YAMAGISHI, and Y. YABE
Rotational Limitation of the Forearm Secondary to Osteoid Osteoma of the Radius
J Rheumatol, September 1, 2009; 36(9): 2131 - 2132.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
M. C. Gebhardt, D. I. Rosenthal, and P. M. Arnell
Case 8-2005 - A 10-Year-Old Boy with Pain in the Right Thigh
N. Engl. J. Med., March 17, 2005; 352(11): 1122 - 1129.
[Full Text] [PDF]