This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DELLA VALLE, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by DI CESARE, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DELLA VALLE, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by DI CESARE, P. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 81:684-9 (1999)
© 1999 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Analysis of Frozen Sections of Intraoperative Specimens Obtained at the Time of Reoperation After Hip or Knee Resection Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Infection*

CRAIG J. DELLA VALLE, M.D.{dagger}, ERIC BOGNER, B.A.{dagger}, PANNA DESAI, M.D.{ddagger}, JESS H. LONNER, M.D.§, EDWARD ADLER, M.D.{dagger}, JOSEPH D. ZUCKERMAN, M.D.{dagger} and PAUL E. DI CESARE, M.D.{dagger}, NEW YORK, N.Y.

Investigation performed at the Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute, New York City

Background: Despite the effectiveness of a two-stage exchange protocol for the treatment of deep periprosthetic infection, infection can persist after resection arthroplasty and treatment with antibiotics, leading to a failed second-stage reconstruction. Intraoperative analysis of frozen sections has been shown to have a high sensitivity and specificity for the identification of infection at the time of revision arthroplasty; however, the usefulness of this test at the time of reoperation after resection arthroplasty and treatment with antibiotics is, to our knowledge, unknown. Methods: The medical records of sixty-four consecutive patients who had had a resection arthroplasty of either the knee (thirty-three patients) or the hip (thirty-one patients) and had had intraoperative analysis of frozen sections of periprosthetic tissue obtained at the time of a second-stage operation were reviewed. The mean interval between the resection arthroplasty and the attempted reimplantation was nineteen weeks. The results of the intraoperative analysis of the frozen sections were compared with those of analysis of permanent histological sections of the same tissues and with those of intraoperative cultures of specimens obtained from within the joint. The findings of the analyses of the frozen sections and the permanent histological sections were considered to be consistent with acute inflammation and infection if a mean of ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes or more per high-power field (forty times magnification) were seen in the five most cellular areas. Results: The intraoperative frozen sections of the specimens from two patients (one of whom was considered to have a persistent infection) met the criteria for acute inflammation. Four patients were considered to have a persistent infection on the basis of positive intraoperative cultures or permanent histological sections. Overall, intraoperative analysis of frozen sections at the time of reimplantation after resection arthroplasty had a sensitivity of 25 percent (detection of one of four persistent infections), a specificity of 98 percent, a positive predictive value of 50 percent (one of two), a negative predictive value of 95 percent, and an accuracy of 94 percent. Conclusions: A negative finding on intraoperative analysis of frozen sections has a high predictive value with regard to ruling out the presence of infection; however, the sensitivity of the test for the detection of persistent infection is poor.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. Bori, A. Soriano, S. Garcia, C. Mallofre, J. Riba, and J. Mensa
Usefulness of Histological Analysis for Predicting the Presence of Microorganisms at the Time of Reimplantation After Hip Resection Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Infection
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2007; 89(6): 1232 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. W. Bauer, J. Parvizi, N. Kobayashi, and V. Krebs
Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2006; 88(4): 869 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. L. Barrack and R. S. J. Burnett
Preoperative Planning for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(12): 2800 - 2811.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. M. Leone and A. D. Hanssen
Management of Infection at the Site of a Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2005; 87(10): 2335 - 2348.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. A. Buttaro, R. Pusso, and F. Piccaluga
Vancomycin-supplemented impacted bone allografts in infected hip arthroplasty: TWO-STAGE REVISION RESULTS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2005; 87-B(3): 314 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Love, S. E. Marwin, M. B. Tomas, E. S. Krauss, G. G. Tronco, K. K. Bhargava, K. J. Nichols, and C. J. Palestro
Diagnosing Infection in the Failed Joint Replacement: A Comparison of Coincidence Detection 18F-FDG and 111In-Labeled Leukocyte/99mTc-Sulfur Colloid Marrow Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1864 - 1871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. D. M. Stumpe, H. P. Notzli, M. Zanetti, E. M. Kamel, T. F. Hany, G. W. Gorres, G. K. von Schulthess, and J. Hodler
FDG PET for Differentiation of Infection and Aseptic Loosening in Total Hip Replacements: Comparison with Conventional Radiography and Three-Phase Bone Scintigraphy
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 333 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. D. Conway, M. A. Mont, and H. P. Bezwada
Arthrodesis of the Knee
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 835 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. J. Palestro
Nuclear Medicine, the Painful Prosthetic Joint, and Orthopedic Infection
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 927 - 929.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Love, M. B. Tomas, S. E. Marwin, P. V. Pugliese, and C. J. Palestro
Role of Nuclear Medicine in Diagnosis of the Infected Joint Replacement
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1229 - 1238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. C. Mears and J. H. Velyvis
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2000; 82(9): 1328 - 1328.
[Full Text] [PDF]