This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KIRKLEY, A.
Right arrow Articles by FOWLER, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KIRKLEY, A.
Right arrow Articles by FOWLER, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 81:539-48 (1999)
© 1999 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

The Effect of Bracing on Varus Gonarthrosis*

A. KIRKLEY, M.D.{dagger}, S. WEBSTER-BOGAERT, M.SC.{dagger}, R. LITCHFIELD, M.D.{dagger}, A. AMENDOLA, M.D.{dagger}, S. MACDONALD, M.D.{ddagger}, R. MCCALDEN, M.D.{ddagger} and P. FOWLER, M.D.{dagger}, LONDON, ONTARIO, CANADA

Investigation performed at the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare a custom-made valgus-producing functional knee (unloader) brace, a neoprene sleeve, and medical treatment only (control group) with regard to their ability to improve the disease-specific quality of life and the functional status of patients who had osteoarthritis in association with a varus deformity of the knee (varus gonarthrosis). Methods: The study design was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Patients who had varus gonarthrosis were screened for eligibility. The criteria for exclusion included arthritides other than osteoarthritis; an operation on the knee within the previous six months; symptomatic disease of the hip, ankle, or foot; a previous fracture of the tibia or femur; morbid obesity (a body-mass index of more than thirty-five kilograms per square meter); skin disease; peripheral vascular disease or varicose veins that would preclude use of a brace; a severe cardiovascular deficit; blindness; poor English-language skills; and an inability to apply a brace because of physical limitations such as arthritis in the hand or an inability to bend over. Treatment was assigned on the basis of a computer-generated block method of randomization with use of sealed envelopes. The patients were stratified according to age (less than fifty years or at least fifty years), deformity (the mechanical axis in less than 5 degrees of varus or in at least 5 degrees of varus), and the status of the anterior cruciate ligament (torn or intact). The patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: medical treatment only (control group), medical treatment and use of a neoprene sleeve, or medical treatment and use of an unloader brace. The disease-specific quality of life was measured with use of the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the McMaster-Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire (MACTAR), and function was assessed with use of the six-minute walking and thirty-second stair-climbing tests. The primary outcome measure consisted of an analysis of covariance of the change in scores between the baseline and six-month evaluations. Results: One hundred and nineteen patients were randomized. The control group consisted of forty patients (thirty-one men and nine women; mean age, 60.9 years); the neoprene-sleeve group, of thirty-eight patients (twenty-seven men and eleven women; mean age, 58.2 years); and the unloader-brace group, of forty-one patients (twenty-eight men and thirteen women; mean age, 59.5 years). Nine patients withdrew from the study. At the six-month follow-up evaluation, there was a significant improvement in the disease-specific quality of life (p = 0.001) and in function (p <= 0.001) in both the neoprene-sleeve group and the unloader-brace group compared with the control group. There was a significant difference between the unloader-brace group and the neoprene-sleeve group with regard to pain after both the six-minute walking test (p = 0.021) and the thirty-second stair-climbing test (p = 0.016). There was a strong trend toward a significant difference between the unloader-brace group and the neoprene-sleeve group with regard to the change in the WOMAC aggregate (p = 0.062) and WOMAC physical function scores (p = 0.081). Conclusions: The results indicate that patients who have varus gonarthrosis may benefit significantly from use of a knee brace in addition to standard medical treatment. The unloader brace was, on the average, more effective than the neoprene sleeve. The ideal candidates for each of these bracing options remain to be identified.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal DiseasesHome page
D. J. Hunter
Focusing osteoarthritis management on modifiable risk factors and future therapeutic prospects
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Diseases, October 1, 2009; 1(1): 35 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary ApproachHome page
D. K. Ramsey and M. E. Russell
Unloader Braces for Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis: Implications on Mediating Progression
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, September 1, 2009; 1(5): 416 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Kirkley, T. B. Birmingham, R. B. Litchfield, J. R. Giffin, K. R. Willits, C. J. Wong, B. G. Feagan, A. Donner, S. H. Griffin, L. M. D'Ascanio, et al.
A Randomized Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the Knee
N. Engl. J. Med., September 11, 2008; 359(11): 1097 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. K. Ramsey, K. Briem, M. J. Axe, and L. Snyder-Mackler
A Mechanical Theory for the Effectiveness of Bracing for Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2007; 89(11): 2398 - 2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
M. C. Barron and B. R. Rubin
Managing Osteoarthritic Knee Pain
J Am Osteopath Assoc, November 1, 2007; 107(suppl_6): ES21 - ES27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. Berman
A 60-Year-Old Woman Considering Acupuncture for Knee Pain
JAMA, April 18, 2007; 297(15): 1697 - 1707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. Draganich, B. Reider, T. Rimington, G. Piotrowski, K. Mallik, and S. Nasson
The Effectiveness of Self-Adjustable Custom and Off-the-Shelf Bracing in the Treatment of Varus Gonarthrosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(12): 2645 - 2652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. J Hunter and D. T Felson
Osteoarthritis.
BMJ, March 18, 2006; 332(7542): 639 - 642.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. T. Felson
Clinical practice. Osteoarthritis of the knee.
N. Engl. J. Med., February 23, 2006; 354(8): 841 - 848.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
F. E. Pollo and R. W. Jackson
Knee Bracing for Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2006; 14(1): 5 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
K M Jordan, N K Arden, M Doherty, B Bannwarth, J W J Bijlsma, P Dieppe, K Gunther, H Hauselmann, G Herrero-Beaumont, P Kaklamanis, et al.
EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT)
Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2003; 62(12): 1145 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. H. Lonner
A 57-Year-Old Man With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
JAMA, February 26, 2003; 289(8): 1016 - 1025.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. Bhattacharyya, D. Gale, P. Dewire, S. Totterman, M. E. Gale, S. McLaughlin, T. A. Einhorn, and D. T. Felson
The Clinical Importance of Meniscal Tears Demonstrated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Osteoarthritis of the Knee
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 17, 2003; 85(1): 4 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. E. Pollo, J. C. Otis, S. I. Backus, R. F. Warren, and T. L. Wickiewicz
Reduction of Medial Compartment Loads with Valgus Bracing of the Osteoarthritic Knee
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2002; 30(3): 414 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. J. Williams III, T. L. Wickiewicz, and R. F. Warren
Management of Unicompartmental Arthritis in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2000; 28(5): 749 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]