The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 81:385-90 (1999)
© 1999 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Position of Immobilization After Dislocation of the Shoulder. A Cadaveric Study*
EIJI ITOI, M.D. ,
YUJI HATAKEYAMA, M.D.,
MASAKAZU URAYAMA, M.D.,
RABINDRA L. PRADHAN, M.D.,
TADATO KIDO, M.D. and
KOZO SATO, M.D., AKITA, JAPAN
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita
Background: After reduction of a shoulder dislocation, the torn edges of a Bankart lesion need to be approximated for healing during immobilization. The position of immobilization has traditionally been adduction and internal rotation, but there is little direct evidence to support or discredit the use of this position. The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship between the position of the arm and the coaptation of the edges of a simulated Bankart lesion created in cadaveric shoulders.
Methods: Ten thawed fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used for experimentation. All of the muscles were removed to expose the joint capsule. A simulated Bankart lesion was created by sectioning the anteroinferior aspect of the capsule from the labrum. With linear transducers attached to the anteroinferior and inferior portions of the Bankart lesion, the opening and closing of the lesion were recorded with the arm in 0, 30, 45, and 60 degrees of elevation in the coronal and sagittal planes as well as with the arm in rotation from full internal to full external rotation in 10-degree increments.
Results: With the arm in adduction, the edges of the simulated Bankart lesion were coapted in the range from full internal rotation to 30 degrees of external rotation. With the arm in 30 degrees of flexion or abduction, the edges of the lesion were coapted in neutral and internal rotation but were separated in external rotation. At 45 and 60 degrees of flexion or abduction, the edges were separated regardless of rotation.
Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that, in the cadaveric shoulder, there was a so-called coaptation zone in which the edges of a simulated Bankart lesion were kept approximated without the surrounding muscles.
Clinical Relevance: Recent clinical data indicate that tight anterior soft tissue helps to keep the lesion approximated. Thus, choosing a position of immobilization (within the so-called coaptation zone) that increases tension in the anterior soft tissue (such as adduction and external rotation or abduction and neutral rotation) may be better than immobilizing the shoulder in the conventional position.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
O. Limpisvasti, B. Y. Yang, P. Hosseinzadeh, T.-b. Leba, J. E. Tibone, and T. Q. Lee
The Effect of Glenohumeral Position on the Shoulder After Traumatic Anterior Dislocation
Am. J. Sports Med.,
April 1, 2008;
36(4):
775 - 780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Funk and M. Smith
How to immobilise after shoulder dislocation?
Emerg. Med. J.,
November 1, 2005;
22(11):
814 - 815.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Levy and E. Rath
Traumatic soft tissue injuries of the shoulder girdle
Trauma,
October 1, 2002;
4(4):
223 - 235.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Itoi, R. Sashi, H. Minagawa, T. Shimizu, I. Wakabayashi, and K. Sato
Position of Immobilization After Dislocation of the Glenohumeral Joint : A Study with Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2001;
83(5):
661 - 667.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
