This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CLOHISY, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by HARRIS, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CLOHISY, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by HARRIS, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 81:247-255 (1999)
© 1999 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Primary Hybrid Total Hip Replacement, Performed with Insertion of the Acetabular Component without Cement and a Precoat Femoral Component with Cement. An Average Ten-Year Follow-up Study*

JOHN C. CLOHISY, M.D.{dagger} and WILLIAM H. HARRIS, M.D.{ddagger}, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

Investigation performed at the Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory and the Adult Reconstructive Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

One hundred and twenty-one primary hybrid total hip replacements were performed in 107 patients. A titanium, porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component was fixed with screws, and a collared, chromium-cobalt femoral stem, with a roughened surface and a thin layer of methylmethacrylate on the proximal third, was inserted with contemporary cementing techniques (that is, use of a femoral medullary plug, a cement gun, and centrifugation and pressurization of the cement). Fifteen patients (fifteen hips) died before a minimum duration of follow-up of seven years, four patients (four hips) were too ill for a detailed follow-up examination at the time of the study, and two patients (two hips) refused to be evaluated at the time of the latest follow-up. None of these twenty-one hips had had a revision or a reoperation at the time of the latest follow-up. Eighty-six patients (100 hips) were available for clinical follow-up at an average of 120 months (range, eighty-four to 153 months) and for radiographic follow-up at an average of 118 months (range, eighty-four to 153 months). The average age of the patients at the time of the index arthroplasty was sixty-five years (range, forty-five to eighty-seven years). Three acetabular components were revised because of dissociation of the liner in association with a fracture of a locking tine. One well fixed acetabular component was revised because of pelvic osteolysis, and the femoral stem in the same patient was revised because of aseptic loosening. None of the ninety-six remaining acetabular components migrated, was classified as radiographically loose, or was revised because of aseptic loosening. Osteolytic lesions were identified adjacent to five acetabular components, and one of them was treated with bone-grafting around the well fixed acetabular shell. Two hips had a continuous radiolucent line at the interface between the acetabular implant and the bone. Three femoral stems had evidence of radiographic debonding (a radiolucent line that was one millimeter wide or less between the cement and the prosthesis), and they were classified as radiographically loose despite excellent clinical results. Seven hips had osteolytic areas located in the proximal aspect of the most proximal zones of Gruen et al., and five had small osteolytic regions in more distal areas. The Harris hip score for the eighty-two patients (ninety-six hips) who did not have a revision improved from 48 points (range, 22 to 70 points) preoperatively to 92 points (range, 53 to 100 points) at the most recent follow-up examination. Eighty-one patients had no, slight, or mild pain in the hip, and they were satisfied with the clinical result. In the present study, the hybrid total hip replacement with use of the Harris-Galante acetabular component and the Precoat femoral stem continued to provide an excellent result for most patients at an average of approximately ten years after the operation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
W. Jin, Y. S. Chun, S. Y. Park, K. H. Rhyu, J. S. Park, H. C. Kim, D. M. Yang, and K. N. Ryu
Sonographic Detection of Acetabular Polyethylene Liner Dissociation in Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2009; 28(11): 1597 - 1600.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. F. Lachiewicz, S. S. Kelley, and E. S. Soileau
Survival of Polished Compared with Precoated Roughened Cemented Femoral Components. A Prospective, Randomized Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2008; 90(7): 1457 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
H. Ito, T. Matsuno, and A. Minami
Pre-coated femoral components in hybrid total hip arthroplasty: RESULTS AT 11 YEARS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2005; 87-B(3): 306 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. Ito, T. Matsuno, A. Minami, and Y. Aoki
Intermediate-Term Results After Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Dysplastic Hips
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2003; 85(9): 1725 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y.-H. Kim, S.-H. Oh, and J.-S Kim
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Second-Generation Cementless Total Hip Prosthesis in Patients Younger Than Fifty Years of Age
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 17, 2003; 85(1): 109 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Ong, K. L. Wong, M. Lai, J. P. Garino, and M. E. Steinberg
Early Failure of Precoated Femoral Components in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2002; 84(5): 786 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. A. Harrington Jr., D. O. O'Connor, A. J. Lozynsky, I. Kovach, and W. H. Harris
Effects of Femoral Neck Length, Stem Size, and Body Weight on Strains in the Proximal Cement Mantle
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2002; 84(4): 573 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. E. Templeton, J. J. Callaghan, D. D. Goetz, P. M. Sullivan, and R. C. Johnston
Revision of a Cemented Acetabular Component to a Cementless Acetabular Component : A Ten to Fourteen-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2001; 83(11): 1706 - 1711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. Bhandari, G. H. Guyatt, and M. F. Swiontkowski
User's Guide to the Orthopaedic Literature: How to Use an Article About Prognosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2001; 83(10): 1555 - 1564.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. G. DellaValle, P. S. Ruzo, S. Li, P. Pellicci, T. P. Sculco, and E. A. Salvati
Dislodgment of Polyethylene Liners in First and Second-Generatio{-}n Harris-Galante Acetabular Components : A Report of Eighteen Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2001; 83(4): 553 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text]