This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LEOPOLD, M. S. S. Articles by ROSENBERG, A. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by LEOPOLD, M. S. S. Articles by ROSENBERG, A. G. Social Bookmarking             What's this?

High Rate of Failure of Allograft Reconstruction of the Extensor Mechanism After Total Knee Arthroplasty*

MAJOR SETH S. LEOPOLD, , UNITED STATES ARMY MEDICAL CORPS, NELSON GREIDANUS, M.D., WAYNE G. PAPROSKY, M.D., RICHARD A. BERGER, M.D. and AARON G. ROSENBERG, M.D.CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago

Background: Disruption of the extensor mechanism is an uncommon but devastating complication of total knee arthroplasty. Several techniques for reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after total knee arthroplasty have been reported, but we do not know of any study in which the results of one group's method were corroborated by a second group using the same technique. In the present series, we evaluated the results of reconstruction of the extensor mechanism with use of allograft according to the method described by Emerson et al. Methods: Seven reconstructions of the extensor mechanism with use of a bone-tendon-bone allograft were performed with the technique of Emerson et al. in six patients. The patients were evaluated before and after the operation. The knee score according to the system of The Hospital for Special Surgery, evidence of an extensor lag, use of walking aids, and the ambulatory status of each patient were recorded. The patients were also asked about, and the medical records were reviewed for, episodes of falling related to weakness of the quadriceps after the reconstruction. The mean duration of follow-up was thirty-nine months (range, six to 115 months). As these reconstructions often fail early, the minimum duration of follow-up was six months. Results: All seven reconstructions were rated as clinical failures on the basis of a persistent or recurrent extensor lag of more than 30 degrees. All but one patient needed an assistive device full time for walking, and four patients (five knees) had at least one documented episode of falling that was due to giving-way of the affected knee. Four of the reconstructions were revised; one revision was performed with use of another extensor mechanism allograft and three were performed with use of a medial gastrocnemius rotation flap. The other three clinical failures had not been revised at the time of writing. At the time of the most recent follow-up (or at the time of revision of the extensor reconstruction), the mean extensor lag was 59 degrees and the mean knee score was 52 points (a poor result). Conclusions: Undertensioning of the allograft reconstruction at the time of the operation and attenuation of the allograft both may have played a role in the inability of the patients to regain active extension of the knee postoperatively. Alternative techniques for reconstruction of the extensor mechanism or modifications of this technique should be considered in the treatment of this difficult problem.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. MacDonald, S. Agarwal, M. P. Lorei, N. A. Johanson, and A. A. Freiberg Knee arthrodesis. J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2006; 14(3): 154 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. J. Burnett, R. A. Berger, C. J. Della Valle, S. M. Sporer, J. J. Jacobs, W. G. Paprosky, and A. G. Rosenberg Extensor Mechanism Allograft Reconstruction After Total Knee Arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2005; 87(1_suppl_2): 175 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. J. Burnett, R. A. Berger, W. G. Paprosky, C. J. Della Valle, J. J. Jacobs, and A. G. Rosenberg Extensor Mechanism Allograft Reconstruction After Total Knee Arthroplasty. A COMPARISON OF TWO TECHNIQUES J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2004; 86(12): 2694 - 2699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Yun, H. E. Rubash, R. D. Scott, and R. S. Laskin Quadriceps Rupture Associated with a Proximal Quadriceps Release in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Report of Three Cases J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2003; 85(9): 1809 - 1811. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Parker, M. J. Dunbar, and C. H. Rorabeck Extensor Mechanism Failure Associated With Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prevention and Management J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2003; 11(4): 238 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Christie, D. K. DeBoer, D. A. McQueen, F. W. Cooke, and D. L. Hahn Salvage Procedures for Failed Total Knee Arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 21, 2003; 85(90001): S58 - 62. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Rosenberg, J. J. Jacobs, K. J. Saleh, R. A. Kassim, M. J. Christie, D. G. Lewallen, J. A. Rand, and H. E. Rubash The Patella in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 21, 2003; 85(90001): S63 - 70. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Crossett, R. K. Sinha, V. F. Sechriest, and H. E. Rubash Reconstruction of a Ruptured Patellar Tendon with Achilles Tendon Allograft Following Total Knee Arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 12, 2002; 84(8): 1354 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 1999 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.