The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 80:1336-1340 (1998)
© 1998 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Anti-Infective Efficacy of Antiseptic-Coated Intramedullary Nails*
RABIH O. DAROUICHE, M.D. ,
JAMES FARMER, M.S. ,
CHRISTOPHER CHAPUT, M.S. ,
MOHAMMAD MANSOURI, B.S. ,
GEORGE SALEH, M.D. and
GLENN C. LANDON, M.D. , HOUSTON, TEXAS
Investigation performed at the Departments of Medicine, Orthopaedic Surgery, and Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston
The coating of medical devices with antimicrobial agents has recently emerged as a potentially effective method for the prevention of device-related infections. We examined the anti-infective efficacy of intramedullary nails coated with an antiseptic combination of chlorhexidine and chloroxylenol in a rabbit model of device-related infection after fixation of an open tibial fracture. The rabbits were randomized to receive 2.8-by-100-millimeter stainless-steel tibial intramedullary nails that either were uncoated or were coated with antiseptic. After administration of anesthesia and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, a tibial fracture was created and then reduced with insertion of the intramedullary nail. A bacterial inoculum of 106 colony-forming units of Staphylococcus aureus was injected into the intramedullary canal, and the wound was sutured. Radiographs of the tibiae were made postoperatively, and the rabbits were monitored daily. They were killed at six weeks, or earlier if there was dehiscence of the wound, the fracture became grossly unstable, or the rabbit failed to thrive.
The use of the antiseptic-coated nails was associated with a significantly lower rate of device-related osteomyelitis (two of twenty-two; 9 per cent) than the use of the uncoated nails (thirteen of twenty-one; 62 per cent) (p = 0.0003). The radiographic and histopathological findings were generally similar in the two groups of rabbits. Antiseptic agents were not detected in serum.
The results suggest that antiseptic-coated fracture-fixation devices provide significant local protection against Staphylococcus aureus, which is the most common cause of infections related to orthopaedic devices.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. O. Darouiche, M. D. Mansouri, D. Zakarevicz, A. AlSharif, and G. C. Landon
In Vivo Efficacy of Antimicrobial-Coated Devices
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 2007;
89(4):
792 - 797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Okike and T. Bhattacharyya
Trends in the Management of Open Fractures. A Critical Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2006;
88(12):
2739 - 2748.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Burd, B. P. Conroy, S. C. Meyer, and W. C. Allen
The Effects of Chlorhexidine Irrigation Solution on Contaminated Bone-Tendon Allografts
Am. J. Sports Med.,
March 1, 2000;
28(2):
241 - 244.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|