This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCCARTHY, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by SWIONTKOWSKI, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MCCARTHY, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by SWIONTKOWSKI, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 80:1034-42 (1998)
© 1998 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Correlation between the Measures of Impairment, According to the Modified System of the American Medical Association, and Function*

MELISSA L. MCCARTHY, M.S.{dagger}, BALTIMORE, MARK P. MCANDREW, M.D.{ddagger}, NASHVILLE, ELLEN J. MACKENZIE, PH.D.{dagger}, BALTIMORE, ANDREW R. BURGESS, M.D.§, BALTIMORE, BRAD M. CUSHING, M.D.#, PORTLAND, MAINE, BARBARA J. DELATEUR, M.D.**, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, GREGORY J. JURKOVICH, M.D.{dagger}{dagger}, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, JOHN A. MORRIS, M.D.{ddagger}{ddagger}, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE and MARC F. SWIONTKOWSKI, M.D.§§, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA

Investigation performed at The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Vanderbilt University Hospital, Nashville, and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle

We performed a prospective study of 302 patients who had a fracture of the lower extremity. Our purpose was to determine whether there was any association between impairment ratings of the lower extremity, derived with use of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment by the American Medical Association, and measurements of task performance based on direct observation as well as the patient's own assessment of activity limitation and disability as recorded on the Sickness Impact Profile. The mean residual impairment of the lower extremity according to the Guides was 27 per cent one year after the injury. Only 130 subjects (43 per cent) could perform all five functional tasks without difficulty. Eighty-four subjects (28 per cent) reported functional limitations that resulted in a score on the Sickness Impact Profile that was more than one standard deviation from the preinjury norm for the sample. Impairment ratings according to a modification of the system of the American Medical Association correlated strongly with the performance of functional tasks (r = 0.57) as well as the patients' reported activity limitations as recorded on the Sickness Impact Profile (r = 0.55). Correlations were highest when measures of impairment were based on strength rather than on range of motion. The relationship between the impairment rating and function (as observed by an examiner and as reported by the patient) was not influenced by the location of the fracture or the receipt of disability compensation. Our results suggest that the American Medical Association developed a valid approach for the measurement of physical impairment after a fracture of the lower extremity. In our study, the anatomical approach of evaluation based on muscle strength that was described in the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment was the most sensitive measure of impairment compared with the anatomical measure based on range of motion and compared with the functional and diagnostic methods for the rating of impairment. Until the diagnostic and functional approaches for the measurement of musculoskeletal impairment are refined, we recommend use of the anatomical approach when evaluating impairment after a fracture of the lower extremity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ptjournalHome page
A. I Greenspan, S. L Wolf, M. E Kelley, and M. O'Grady
Tai Chi and Perceived Health Status in Older Adults Who Are Transitionally Frail: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2007; 87(5): 525 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
H. R Holtslag, M. W Post, C. van der Werken, and E. Lindeman
Return to work after major trauma
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2007; 21(4): 373 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ptjournalHome page
K. R Archer, R. C Castillo, E. J MacKenzie, M. J Bosse, and and the Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP)
Gait Symmetry and Walking Speed Analysis Following Lower-Extremity Trauma
Physical Therapy, December 1, 2006; 86(12): 1630 - 1640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. M. Melhorn
Impairment and Disability Evaluations: Understanding the Process
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2001; 83(12): 1905 - 1911.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
E. A. Spieler, P. S. Barth, J. F. Burton Jr, J. Himmelstein, and L. Rudolph
Recommendations to Guide Revision of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment
JAMA, January 26, 2000; 283(4): 519 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]