This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARKOLF, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by HOTCHKISS, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARKOLF, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by HOTCHKISS, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 80:879-88 (1998)
© 1998 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Radioulnar Load-Sharing in the Forearm. A Study in Cadavera*

KEITH L. MARKOLF, PH.D.{dagger}, DAVID LAMEY, M.D.{ddagger}, STEVEN YANG, M.D.§, ROY MEALS, M.D.{dagger} and ROBERT HOTCHKISS, M.D.#, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

Investigation performed at the Biomechanics Research Section, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles

Custom-designed miniature load-cells were inserted into the distal end of the ulna and the proximal end of the radius in ten fresh-frozen forearms from cadavera. The forces transmitted through the bones at these sites were measured under 134 newtons of constant axial load that was applied through the metacarpals as the forearm was rotated from 60 degrees of supination to 60 degrees of pronation. The simultaneous measurements of these forces allowed the calculation of radioulnar load-sharing at the wrist and the elbow as well as the calculation of the amount of force that was transferred from the radius to the ulna through the interosseous membrane. With the elbow in valgus alignment (that is, with contact between the radial head and the capitellum), the main pathway for load transmission through the forearm was direct axial loading of the radius; measurements from both load-cells were unaffected by the angle of elbow flexion. When the forearm was in neutral rotation, the mean force in the distal end of the ulna averaged 2.8 per cent of the load applied to the wrist and the mean force in the proximal end of the ulna averaged 11.8 per cent; this indicated that only a small amount of tension developed in the interosseous membrane. With the elbow in varus alignment (that is, with no contact between the radial head and the capitellum), load was transmitted through the forearm by a transfer of force from the radius to the ulna through the interosseous membrane. When the forearm was in neutral rotation, the force in the distal end of the ulna averaged 7.0 per cent of the load applied to the wrist and the force in the proximal end of the ulna averaged 93.0 per cent; the force through the interosseous membrane decreased with supination of the forearm. Testing with the elbow in valgus alignment and shortening of the distal end of the radius in two-millimeter increments produced corresponding increases in force in the distal end of the ulna and decreases in force in the radial head. The forces through the interosseous membrane remained low after each amount of radial shortening. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Transfer of load from the wrist, through the radius and the ulna, to the elbow is a complex event that depends on the position of the forearm, anatomy of the wrist, and soft-tissue linkages between the radius and the ulna. Varus-valgus alignment of the elbow influences the basic mechanism of force transmission through the forearm. The interosseous membrane plays a minimum role in load transmission with the elbow in valgus alignment. Dynamic gripping activities that include varus stress to the elbow would be expected to develop force in the interosseous membrane. Radioulnar load-sharing at the wrist and the elbow changed significantly when the distal end of the radius was shortened by as little as two millimeters (p < 0.05). With the elbow in valgus alignment, four millimeters of shortening was required to approximately balance the radioulnar loads at the wrist.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
Y. H. Lee, S. K. Lee, M. S. Chung, G. H. Baek, H. S. Gong, and K. H. Kim
Interlocking Contoured Intramedullary Nail Fixation for Selected Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm in Adults
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2008; 90(9): 1891 - 1898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. L. Markolf, S. G. Tejwani, G. O'Neil, and P. Benhaim
Load-Sharing at the Wrist Following Radial Head Replacement with a Metal Implant. A Cadaveric Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2004; 86(5): 1023 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. C. McGinley, B. C. Hopgood, J. P. Gaughan, K. Sadeghipour, and S. H. Kozin
Forearm and Elbow Injury: The Influence of Rotational Position
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2003; 85(12): 2403 - 2409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. F. Shepard, K. L. Markolf, and A. M. Dunbar
Effects of Radial Head Excision and Distal Radial Shortening on Load-Sharing in Cadaver Forearms
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2001; 83(1): 93 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text]