This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORONI, A.
Right arrow Articles by GIANNINI, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MORONI, A.
Right arrow Articles by GIANNINI, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 80:547-54 (1998)
© 1998 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

A Comparison of Hydroxyapatite-Coated, Titanium-Coated, and Uncoated Tapered External-Fixation Pins. An in Vivo Study in Sheep*

ANTONIO MORONI, M.D.{dagger}, SOREN TOKSVIG-LARSEN, M.D.{ddagger}, MARIA CRISTINA MALTARELLO, B.SC.{dagger}, LUCA ORIENTI, M.D.{dagger}, SUSANNA STEA, B.SC.{dagger} and SANDRO GIANNINI, M.D.{dagger}, BOLOGNA, ITALY

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bologna University, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna

Three types of surfaces for external fixation pins were compared. One hundred and eight stainless-steel tapered 5/6-millimeter pins were divided into three groups: thirty-six pins remained uncoated (Group A), thirty-six were plasma-sprayed with hydroxyapatite (Group B), and thirty-six were plasma-sprayed with titanium (Group C). The pins were implanted in the left tibia of eighteen sheep, with each sheep receiving six pins from the same group. A unilateral fixator then was assembled on the pins. The medial aspect of the mid-part of the tibial diaphysis was exposed, and a five-millimeter-long cylinder of bone was removed so that load would be borne by the bone-pin interfaces. Six weeks after the procedure, radiographs demonstrated rarefaction of twenty-nine pin tracks in Group A, fifteen in Group B, and thirty in Group C (p = 0.021 for Group A compared with Group B and p = 0.016 for Group B compared with Group C). The mean final insertion torque (and standard deviation) was 4360 ± 1050 newton-millimeters in Group A, 3420 ± 676 newton-millimeters in Group B, and 3740 ± 643 newton-millimeters in Group C. With the numbers available, no significant differences could be detected among these values. The mean extraction torque was 253 ± 175 newton-millimeters in Group A, 3360 ± 1260 newton-millimeters in Group B, and 1720 ± 1030 newton-millimeters in Group C (p = 0.002 for Group A compared with Group B, p = 0.017 for Group A compared with Group C, and p = 0.03 for Group B compared with Group C). The extraction torque was significantly lower than the corresponding insertion torque in both Group A (p < 0.001) and Group C (p = 0.003); no significant difference could be found, with the numbers available, in Group B (hydroxyapatite-coated pins). At sixty times magnification, direct contact was seen along a mean of 16 ± 9 per cent of the bone-pin interface in Group A, 30 ± 12 per cent of the interface in Group B, and 28 ± 15 per cent of the interface in Group C (p = 0.042 for Group A compared with Group C). However, at 10,000 times magnification, direct bone-pin contact was found only in Group B. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The better fixation and greater interface strength of the hydroxyapatite-coated tapered pins should lead to a substantial decrease in the frequency of loosening and infection and consequently to a remarkable improvement in the clinical results of external fixation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. J. Keeling, D. E. Gwinn, S. M. Tintle, R. C. Andersen, and F. X. McGuigan
Short-Term Outcomes of Severe Open Wartime Tibial Fractures Treated with Ring External Fixation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2008; 90(12): 2643 - 2651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Moroni, C. Faldini, F. Pegreffi, A. Hoang-Kim, F. Vannini, and S. Giannini
Dynamic Hip Screw Compared with External Fixation for Treatment of Osteoporotic Pertrochanteric Fractures. A Prospective, Randomized Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2005; 87(4): 753 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Moroni, C. Faldini, S. Marchetti, M. Manca, V. Consoli, and S. Giannini
Improvement of the Bone-Pin Interface Strength in Osteoporotic Bone with Use of Hydroxyapatite-Coated Tapered External-Fixation Pins : A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study of Wrist Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2001; 83(5): 717 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]