This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MIRIC, A.
Right arrow Articles by PATTERSON, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MIRIC, A.
Right arrow Articles by PATTERSON, B. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 80:207-12 (1998)
© 1998 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Pathoanatomy of Intra-Articular Fractures of the Calcaneus*

ALEXANDER MIRIC, M.D.{dagger} and BRENDAN M. PATTERSON, M.D.{dagger}, CLEVELAND, OHIO

Investigation performed at the MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland

Radiographs of 220 calcaneal fractures (205 patients) were reviewed retrospectively. One hundred and sixty-three fractures were intra-articular; thirty (18 per cent) of the 163 fractures were a tongue-type injury, and 133 (82 per cent) were a joint-depression injury. Plain radiographs and computerized tomography scans in the coronal and axial planes were available for 116 intra-articular fractures (106 patients). These studies were reviewed, and the 116 fractures were grouped according to the Sanders classification of calcaneal fractures and the anterior extension of the primary fracture line was evaluated. Sixty-two primary fracture lines (53 per cent) extended into one articular surface; twenty-three (20 per cent), into two articular surfaces; twenty-three (20 per cent), into a periarticular location; and eight (7 per cent), into a medial or lateral location. Sixty-seven (58 per cent) involved the calcaneocuboid joint, thirty-one (27 per cent) involved the anterior facet of the talocalcaneal joint, and ten (9 per cent) involved the middle facet of the talocalcaneal joint. A distinct anterolateral fragment was identified in 108 fractures (93 per cent). Plain radiographs failed to demonstrate the anterior extension of fifty-one (47 per cent) of the primary fracture lines. The prevalence of involvement of the anterior facet was significantly greater in Sanders type-III fractures (sixteen of thirty-five; 46 per cent) than in the other types (p < 0.01). The prevalence of involvement of the calcaneocuboid joint and the middle facet was evenly distributed among the fracture types. The primary fracture line typically extends anterior to the angle of Gissane, creating a relatively consistent anterolateral fracture fragment. The primary fracture line cannot be reliably seen on plain radiographs and is better visualized on computerized tomographic scans.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?