This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WENGER, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by LIEBERMAN, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WENGER, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by LIEBERMAN, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 80:198-206 (1998)
© 1998 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

An Assessment of Orthopaedic Surgeons' Knowledge of Medical Ethics*

NEIL S. WENGER, M.D., M.P.H.{dagger} and JAY R. LIEBERMAN, M.D.{dagger}, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

Investigation performed at the Departments of Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles

We developed a survey instrument to evaluate knowledge of ethical issues among orthopaedic surgeons and to assess their ability to handle ethical dilemmas. The twenty-six-item survey evaluates seven areas of medical practice: confidentiality, informed consent, truth-telling, the physician-patient relationship, economic aspects of care, end-of-life decision-making, and the approach to an incompetent colleague. It was administered to 117 attending orthopaedic surgeons and residents in two orthopaedic surgery training programs. One hundred and two orthopaedic surgeons (87 per cent) completed the survey. Overall, they correctly answered a mean of nineteen (73 per cent) of the twenty-six questions. The respondents appropriately handled questions involving economic aspects, truth-telling, confidentiality, and an incompetent colleague. However, there was poorer understanding of proper ethical conduct with regard to informed consent (58 per cent of the responses were correct), the physician-patient relationship (72 per cent of the responses were correct), and end-of-life decision-making (78 per cent of the responses were correct). No significant differences were found, with the numbers available, in overall performance according to site, attending compared with resident status, age, gender, or whether the physician had had training in ethics. Economic, social, and professional forces have increased the medical ethical issues facing orthopaedic surgeons. Medical ethics now must be taught in training programs in orthopaedic surgery. Our survey of two orthopaedic surgery training programs demonstrated that orthopaedic surgeons approach most medical ethical problems appropriately. However, improvement is needed in selected areas.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
W. R. Dunn, M. S. George, L. Churchill, and K. P. Spindler
Ethics in Sports Medicine
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 35(5): 840 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
N. S. WENGER, H. LIU, and J. R. LIEBERMAN
Teaching Medical Ethics to Orthopaedic Surgery Residents
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 1998; 80(8): 1125 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
H. R. Cowell
Editorial - Ethics of Medical Authorship
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 1998; 80(2): 151 - 3.
[Full Text]