This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WANG, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by RIEW, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WANG, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by RIEW, K. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 80:1728-32 (1998)
© 1998 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Dural Tears Secondary to Operations on the Lumbar Spine. Management and Results After a Two-Year-Minimum Follow-up of Eighty-eight Patients*

JEFFREY C. WANG, M.D.{dagger}, HENRY H. BOHLMAN, M.D.{ddagger} and K. DANIEL RIEW, M.D.§, CLEVELAND, OHIO

Investigation performed at University Hospitals Spine Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland

We reviewed the results of acute management of patients who had sustained a dural tear during an operation on the lumbar spine, and we attempted to determine the long-term sequelae of this complication. In the five years from July 1989 to July 1994, 641 consecutive patients had a decompression of the lumbar spine, performed by the senior one of us; of these patients, eighty-eight (14 percent) sustained a dural tear, which was repaired during the operation. The duration of follow-up ranged from two to eight years (average, 4.3 years). Postoperative management consisted of closed suction wound drainage for an average of 2.1 days and bed rest for an average of 2.9 days. Of the eighty-eight procedures that resulted in a dural tear, forty-five were revisions; these revisions were performed after an average of 2.2 previous operations on the lumbar spine, all of which resulted in a scar adherent to the dura. Only eight patients had headaches related to the spinal procedure and photophobia in the postoperative period; these symptoms resolved in all but two patients, both of whom had had a revision operation. Each of the two patients had symptoms of a persistent leak of spinal fluid and needed a reoperation for repair. Overall, seventy-six patients had a good or excellent result and twelve had a poor or satisfactory result with some residual back pain. One patient had arachnoiditis, and another had symptoms of viral meningitis one month postoperatively. A dural tear that occurs during an operation on the lumbar spine can be treated successfully with primary repair followed by bed rest. Such a tear does not appear to have any long-term deleterious effects or to increase the risk of postoperative infection, neural damage, or arachnoiditis. Closed suction wound drainage does not seem to aggravate the leak and can be used safely in the presence of a dural repair.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
D. Hannallah, J. Lee, M. Khan, W. F. Donaldson, and J. D. Kang
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks Following Cervical Spine Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2008; 90(5): 1101 - 1105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. C. Ain, T.-L. Chang, J. G. Schkrohowsky, E. S. Carlisle, M. Hodor, and D. Rigamonti
Rates of Perioperative Complications Associated with Laminectomies in Patients with Achondroplasia
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2008; 90(2): 295 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
G. D. Wera, R. E. Marcus, A. J. Ghanayem, and H. H. Bohlman
Failure within One Year Following Subtotal Lumbar Discectomy
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2008; 90(1): 10 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. S. Yuan and T. J. Albert
Nonsurgical and Surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2004; 86(10): 2319 - 2330.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
G. Samandouras, V. Bajtajic, F. Cross, and P. J. Hamlyn
Cranial Subdural Hygroma Complicating Thoracic Disc Surgery. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 2033 - 2037.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
C.-H. Lu, S.-T. Ho, S.-S. Kong, C.-H. Cherng, and C.-S. Wong
Intracranial subdural hematoma after unintended durotomy during spine surgery: [Un hematome sous-dural intracranien cause par la durotomie involontaire lors d'une operation a la colonne vertebrale]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2002; 49(1): 100 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
A. A. Leis, J. M. Leis, and J. R. Leis
Pseudomeningoceles: A role for mechanical compression in the treatment of dural tears
Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 1116 - 1117.
[Full Text] [PDF]