This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by HARRIS, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by HARRIS, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 80:1632-40 (1998)
© 1998 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Use of Second-Generation Cementing Techniques. An Eighteen-Year-Average Follow-up Study*

STEPHEN W. SMITH, M.D.{dagger}, DANIEL M. ESTOK, II, M.D.{ddagger} and WILLIAM H. HARRIS, M.D.{ddagger}, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

Investigation performed at the Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory and the Hip and Implant Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

In this report, we present the results of a further follow-up of a series of 140 consecutive patients (161 hips) who had had a primary total hip arthroplasty with insertion of a bead-blasted monoblock femoral component with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. The average age of the patients at the time of the arthroplasty was sixty-one years (range, twenty-one to eighty-five years). Sixty-seven patients (seventy-seven hips) died less than seventeen years after the index operation. The remaining seventy-three patients (eighty-four hips) were followed for an average of eighteen years (range, seventeen to twenty years). No patient was lost to follow-up. In the entire group of 161 hips, over the twenty-year span of the study, eight femoral components (5 percent) and twenty-eight acetabular components (17 percent) had been revised because of aseptic loosening. Of the seventy-seven hips in the sixty-seven patients who died, four had been revised because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component only; one, because of aseptic loosening of the femoral component only; and one, because of aseptic loosening of both components. Of the eighty-four hips in the seventy-three patients who were alive at least seventeen years after the index arthroplasty, twenty-four hips (29 percent) in twenty-one patients had had revision of one or both components for any reason. Twenty-three acetabular components (27 percent) and six femoral components (7 percent) had been revised because of aseptic loosening. An additional two hips (2 percent) in two patients were loose according to radiographic criteria but had not been revised. Of the sixty-five all-polyethylene acetabular components that had been inserted with cement and were in patients who were alive at least seventeen years postoperatively, fifteen (23 percent) had been revised because of aseptic loosening. An additional seventeen cups (26 percent) were loose according to radiographic criteria. Thus, a total of thirty-two cups (49 percent) had been revised because of loosening or were loose but had not been revised at the time of the latest follow-up. The femoral components that had been inserted with use of second-generation cementing techniques fared better than did the acetabular components that had been inserted with these techniques during the same time-period. We found that assessment of all postoperative radiographs rather than only those that had been made immediately postoperatively increased the accuracy of the grading of the cement around the femoral component. Subsequent radiographs frequently had been made at different projections, which revealed new findings, consisting primarily of previously undetected voids, areas of thin cement, and defects in the cement mantle. Thus, we now use all available radiographs to determine the grade of the cement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Sanchez-Sotelo, D. J. Berry, and S. Harmsen
Long-Term Results of Use of a Collared Matte-Finished Femoral Component Fixed with Second-Generation Cementing Techniques : A Fifteen-Year-Median Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 3, 2002; 84(9): 1636 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. K. Collis and C. G. Mohler
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Rough and Polished Cemented Stems with Essentially the Same Geometry
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2002; 84(4): 586 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. Illgen II and H. E. Rubash
The Optimal Fixation of the Cementless Acetabular Component in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2002; 10(1): 43 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. S. Klapach, J. J. Callaghan, D. D. Goetz, J. P. Olejniczak, and R. C. Johnston
Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty with Use of Improved Cementing Techniques : A Minimum Twenty-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2001; 83(12): 1840 - 1848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. T. Dearborn and W. H. Harris
Acetabular Revision After Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Congenital Hip Dislocation and Dysplasia : Results After a Mean of 8.6 Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2000; 82(8): 1146 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. C. CLOHISY and W. H. HARRIS
Primary Hybrid Total Hip Replacement, Performed with Insertion of the Acetabular Component without Cement and a Precoat Femoral Component with Cement. An Average Ten-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 1999; 81(2): 247 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text]