This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAVIG, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by SEILER III, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HAVIG, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by SEILER III, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 79:428-32 (1997)
© 1997 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Assessment of Radiolucent Lines about the Glenoid: An In Vitro Radiographic Study*

MICHAEL T. HAVIG, M.D.{dagger}, AVINASH KUMAR, B.S.{dagger}, WALTER CARPENTER, M.D., PH.D.{dagger} and JOHN G. SEILER III, M.D.{ddagger}, ATLANTA, GEORGIA

Investigation performed at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta

A study was undertaken to investigate the precision of plain radiographs in the assessment of the width of radiolucent lines and to define parameters for more accurate measurement. A metal-backed glenoid component was inserted into fourteen cadaveric scapulae; the component had a radiolucent spacer at the central post to provide a gap with a known width at the component-bone interface. The specimens were mounted in a custom-designed jig, and initial radiographs were made with the glenoid in neutral version; sequential radiographs then were made, at 5-degree intervals, with the glenoid in 0 to 40 degrees of anteversion and retroversion. Four independent observers with various levels of experience measured the width of the radiolucent lines with use of digital microcalipers. Osteometric analysis demonstrated that normal glenoid version ranged from 3 degrees of anteversion to 13 degrees of retroversion; these values were similar to those reported in previous studies. Radiographic analysis showed that accurate measurement of the width of the gap was dependent on the position of the glenoid. The measured widths of the radiolucent lines were significantly smaller than the known width of the gap when retroversion was 10 degrees or more and when anteversion was 15 degrees or more (p <= 0.05). Radiolucent lines were not consistently observed on radiographs that were made with the glenoid in more than 20 degrees of anteversion and retroversion. An analysis of interobserver error showed close agreement among the measurements made by the different observers when the glenoid was in 0 and 5 degrees of rotation, with decreased agreement when the glenoid was rotated more than 10 degrees from neutral. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Inaccurate positioning of the patient and anatomical variation in glenoid version may explain the variability in the reported onsets, progressions, and frequencies of radiographic loosening of glenoid components. The findings of the present study also may help to explain the poor association between clinical and radiographic findings reported for patients who have pain at the site of a total shoulder prosthesis. Radiographs made within 10 degrees of neutral should allow accurate assessment of radiolucent lines about the glenoid.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
F. A. Matsen III, J. Clinton, J. Lynch, A. Bertelsen, and M. L. Richardson
Glenoid Component Failure in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2008; 90(4): 885 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. H. Yian, C. M.L. Werner, R. W. Nyffeler, C. W. Pfirrmann, A. Ramappa, A. Sukthankar, and C. Gerber
Radiographic and Computed Tomography Analysis of Cemented Pegged Polyethylene Glenoid Components in Total Shoulder Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2005; 87(9): 1928 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. D. Lazarus, K. L. Jensen, C. Southworth, and F. A. Matsen III
The Radiographic Evaluation of Keeled and Pegged Glenoid Component Insertion
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 9, 2002; 84(7): 1174 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. L. WALLACE, R. L. PHILLIPS, G. A. MACDOUGAL, W. R. WALSH, and D. H. SONNABEND
Resurfacing of the Glenoid in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. A Comparison, at a Mean of Five Years, of Prostheses Inserted with and without Cement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1999; 81(4): 510 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text]