This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COONEY, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by LINSCHEID, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COONEY, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by LINSCHEID, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 79:406-12 (1997)
© 1997 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

En Bloc Resection of Tumors of the Distal End of the Ulna*{dagger}

WILLIAM P. COONEY, B.S.{ddagger}, TIMOTHY A. DAMRON, M.D.§, FRANKLIN H. SIM, M.D.{ddagger} and RONALD L. LINSCHEID, M.D.{ddagger}, ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester

The operative treatment of malignant tumors and aggressive benign tumors involving the distal end of the ulna often necessitates en bloc resection. The oncological and functional results for eight patients in whom a neoplasm involving the distal end of the ulna had been treated with en bloc resection without reconstruction of the osseous defect were reviewed retrospectively at a mean of seventy-nine months (range, twenty-three to 271 months). Four patients had a giant-cell tumor; two, a low-grade osteogenic sarcoma; one, a hemangioendothelioma; and one, a soft-tissue epithelioid sarcoma with osseous involvement. The amount of bone that was removed from the distal end of the ulna ranged from 3.1 to 9.0 centimeters. In the four patients who had a malignant tumor, a minimum of 7.5 centimeters was removed in order to achieve an adequate wide margin proximally. In the patients who had a benign tumor, a maximum of 6.6 centimeters was resected. Extraperiosteal resection was performed in three of the patients who had a malignant tumor and in one of the patients who had an aggressive giant-cell tumor. Subperiosteal resection was performed in the three patients who had a benign tumor and in one patient who had a parosteal osteogenic sarcoma. None of the patients had local or systemic evidence of recurrence of the tumor. The functional result was excellent for six patients and good for two. Grip strength was reduced by a mean of 15 per cent compared with the strength on the contralateral side, and this reduction did not appear to be related directly to the amount of bone that had been resected. The findings of this study support the concept that routine reconstruction of the osseous defect is not necessary after en bloc resection of a neoplasm of the distal end of the ulna.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?