This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARKOLF, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by FINERMAN, G. A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARKOLF, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by FINERMAN, G. A. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 79:381-6 (1997)
© 1997 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

A Biomechanical Study of Replacement of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament with a Graft. Part II: Forces in the Graft Compared with Forces in the Intact Ligament*

KEITH L. MARKOLF, PH.D.{dagger}, JAMES R. SLAUTERBECK, M.D.{ddagger}, KEVIN L. ARMSTRONG, M.D.{dagger}, MATTHEW S. SHAPIRO, M.D.{dagger} and GERALD A. M. FINERMAN, M.D.{dagger}, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

Investigation performed at the Biomechanics Research Section, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles

A femoral load-cell was installed in twelve fresh-frozen knee specimens from cadavera, to measure the resultant force at the femoral origin of the posterior cruciate ligament during a series of tibial-loading tests. The posterior cruciate ligament was removed, and a ten-millimeter-wide bone-patellar ligament-bone graft was inserted. The knee was flexed to 90 degrees, the graft was pre-tensioned to restore the anterior-posterior laxity to that recorded after installation of the load-cell, and the loading tests were repeated. With the tibia locked in neutral rotation and a 200-newton posterior force applied to the tibia, the mean force generated in the intact posterior cruciate ligament ranged from 220 newtons at 90 degrees of flexion to thirty-six newtons at full extension. When the tibia was locked in external rotation during the posterior drawer test, the force was reduced when the knee was flexed 10 to 70 degrees; when the tibia was locked in internal rotation, the mean force was reduced at only 30 and 45 degrees of flexion. The mean forces in the graft were not significantly different, with the numbers available, from the corresponding values for the intact ligament during application of a straight posterior tibial force (neutral tibial rotation), during application of a fifteen-newton-meter flexion or extension moment (hyperflexion or hyperextension), during application of a ten-newton-meter varus or valgus moment, or during application of a ten-newton-meter internal or external tibial torque. With the numbers available, there were no significant differences between the mean tibial rotations associated with the intact posterior cruciate ligament and those associated with the graft at any angle of flexion, without or with applied tibial torque. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The amount of force generated in the posterior cruciate ligament during the posterior drawer test depends on the angle of flexion at which the test is performed. When the angle of flexion is near 90 degrees, all of the posterior force applied to the tibia is transmitted to the ligament and the force in the ligament is not affected by the position of tibial rotation. When the test is performed at an angle of flexion near 30 degrees and in neutral tibial rotation, other structures (such as the collateral ligaments and the posterior part of the capsule) help to resist the posterior force applied to the tibia. The position of tibial rotation is important when the test is performed with the knee at an angle of flexion near 30 degrees, as secondary structures pre-tensioned by tibial torque act to reduce the amount of force carried by the posterior cruciate ligament even more. With a few minor exceptions, we found that the forces in a graft used to replace the posterior cruciate ligament were approximately the same as those in the intact ligament. Therefore, there appears to be little justification for restricting low-level rehabilitation activities once the fixation of the graft has healed. However, forces in the graft could be quite high during hyperextension and hypertension, as they are in the intact ligament. Thus, bracing in the early postoperative period may be advisable to prevent these motions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
G. Li, R. Papannagari, M. Li, J. Bingham, K. W. Nha, D. Allred, and T. Gill
Effect of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency on In Vivo Translation and Rotation of the Knee During Weightbearing Flexion
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 474 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
E. J Strauss, C. Ishak, C. Inzerillo, M. Walsh, G. Yildirim, P. Walker, L. Jazrawi, J. Rosen, and R. F LaPrade
Effect of tibial positioning on the diagnosis of posterolateral rotatory instability in the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee * COMMENTARY
Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2007; 41(8): 481 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
F. R. Noyes and S. D. Barber-Westin
Posterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Reconstruction, Part 1: Causes of Surgical Failure in 52 Consecutive Operations
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2005; 33(5): 646 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
S. E. Park, B. D. Stamos, L. E. DeFrate, T. J. Gill, and G. Li
The Effect of Posterior Knee Capsulotomy on Posterior Tibial Translation During Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Inlay Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2004; 32(6): 1514 - 1519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. T. Shearn, E. S. Grood, F. R. Noyes, and M. S. Levy
Two-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How Bundle Tension Depends on Femoral Placement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2004; 86(6): 1262 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
T. J. Gill, L. E. DeFrate, C. Wang, C. T. Carey, S. Zayontz, B. Zarins, and G. Li
The Effect of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Patellofemoral Contact Pressures in the Knee Joint Under Simulated Muscle Loads
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2004; 32(1): 109 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
D. A. Oakes, K. L. Markolf, J. McWilliams, C. R. Young, and D. R. McAllister
The Effect of Femoral Tunnel Position on Graft Forces During Inlay Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2003; 31(5): 667 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Markolf, M. Davies, B. Zoric, and D. McAllister
Effects of Bone Block Position and Orientation Within the Tibial Tunnel for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Reconstructions: A Cyclic Loading Study of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2003; 31(5): 673 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
T. J. Gill, L. E. DeFrate, C. Wang, C. T. Carey, S. Zayontz, B. Zarins, and G. Li
The Biomechanical Effect of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Knee Joint Function: Kinematic Response to Simulated Muscle Loads
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2003; 31(4): 530 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
D. A. Oakes, K. L. Markolf, J. McWilliams, C. R. Young, and D. R. McAllister
Biomechanical Comparison of Tibial Inlay and Tibial Tunnel Techniques for Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament : Analysis of Graft Forces
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2002; 84(6): 938 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
D. R. McAllister, K. L. Markolf, D. A. Oakes, C. R. Young, and J. McWilliams
A Biomechanical Comparison of Tibial Inlay and Tibial Tunnel Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques: Graft Pretension and Knee Laxity
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2002; 30(3): 312 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
R. F. LaPrade, C. Muench, F. Wentorf, and J. L. Lewis
The Effect of Injury to the Posterolateral Structures of the Knee on Force in a Posterior Cruciate Ligament Graft: A Biomechanical Study
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2002; 30(2): 233 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
J. A. Bergfeld, D. R. McAllister, R. D. Parker, A. D. C. Valdevit, and H. E. Kambic
A Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2001; 29(2): 129 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
D. A. Mannor, J. T. Shearn, E. S. Grood, F. R. Noyes, and M. S. Levy
Two-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An In Vitro Analysis of Graft Placement and Tension
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2000; 28(6): 833 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
J. Brand Jr., A. Weiler, D. N. M. Caborn, C. H. Brown Jr., and D. L. Johnson
Graft Fixation in Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2000; 28(5): 761 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. L. MARKOLF, J. R. SLAUTERBECK, K. L. ARMSTRONG, M. S. SHAPIRO, and G. A. M. FINERMAN
A Biomechanical Study of Replacement of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament with a Graft. Part I: Isometry, Pre-Tension of the Graft, and Anterior-Posterior Laxity
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1997; 79(3): 375 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text]