This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by HARRIS, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by HARRIS, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 79:1827-33 (1997)
© 1997 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed with Insertion of the Femoral Component with Cement and the Acetabular Component without Cement. Ten to Thirteen-Year Results*

STUART E. SMITH, M.D.{dagger} and WILLIAM H. HARRIS, M.D.{ddagger}, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

Investigation performed at the Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory and the Hip and Implant Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Fifty-two consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties were performed in forty-seven unselected patients by one surgeon. The prosthesis included a hemispherical porous-coated acetabular component, inserted without cement and with the use of screws through three peripheral flanges, and a femoral component, inserted with a so-called second-generation cementing technique. No patient was lost to radiographic follow-up, and the clinical result was known for all patients. The average age at the time of the index operation was fifty-seven years (range, twenty-nine to seventy-nine years). Four patients (four hips) who died were last examined less than ten years postoperatively (the minimum follow-up period for this study) and one hip was revised, leaving forty-seven non-revised hips in forty-two surviving patients who were followed for at least ten years. The duration of clinical follow-up of these forty-two patients averaged 12.3 years (range, 10.8 to 13.3 years), and the duration of radiographic follow-up averaged 12.1 years (range, 10.0 to 13.0 years). One (2 per cent) of the original fifty-two hips was revised for late recurrent dislocation, without loosening, 9.7 years after the index arthroplasty. The rate of dislocation was relatively high (13 per cent; seven hips), and we believed it to be related to the shallow-chamfer acetabular design combined with the small femoral head. At the time of the latest follow-up, no femoral component was loose. One (2 per cent) of the fifty-two acetabular components was loose according to radiographic criteria, but the hip functioned well (Harris hip score, 94 points) 12.4 years after the index arthroplasty. Pelvic osteolysis developed in one hip (2 per cent); femoral osteolysis, in eight (15 per cent); and distal femoral osteolysis, in three (6 per cent). The average Harris hip score for the forty-seven non-revised hips increased from 48 points (range, 26 to 63 points) preoperatively to 89 points (range, 67 to 100 points) at the time of the most recent follow-up. Forty (85 per cent) of the forty-seven hips had a good or excellent result, whereas five (11 per cent) had a fair result (score, 74 to 79 points) and two (4 per cent) had a poor result (score, 67 and 69 points). The hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty resulted in very good clinical function at ten to thirteen years, although the rate of dislocation was high.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
P. K. Chan, I. J Brenkel, and J. Aderinto
The outcome of total hip arthroplasty in diabetes mellitus
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, May 1, 2005; 5(3): 146 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. A. Bojescul, J. S. Xenos, J. J. Callaghan, and C. G. Savory
Results of Porous-Coated Anatomic Total Hip Arthroplasty without Cement at Fifteen Years: A Concise Follow-up of a Previous Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 28, 2003; 85(6): 1079 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. D. Crowther and P. F. Lachiewicz
Survival and Polyethylene Wear of Porous-Coated Acetabular Components in Patients Less than Fifty Years Old : Results at Nine to Fourteen Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2002; 84(5): 729 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. C. CLOHISY and W. H. HARRIS
Primary Hybrid Total Hip Replacement, Performed with Insertion of the Acetabular Component without Cement and a Precoat Femoral Component with Cement. An Average Ten-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 1999; 81(2): 247 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. P. SCHMALZRIED and J. J. CALLAGHAN
Current Concepts Review - Wear in Total Hip and Knee Replacements
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1999; 81(1): 115 - 136.
[Full Text]